On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 12:26 AM, Daniel Farina dan...@heroku.com wrote:
Some time ago I reported bug 6291[0], which reported a Xid wraparound,
both as reported in pg_controldata and by txid_current_snapshot.
Unfortunately, nobody could reproduce it.
Today, the same system of ours just
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 05:06, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to propose to change pg_controldata so that it reports the name
of WAL file containing the latest checkpoint's REDO record, as follows:
$ pg_controldata $PGDATA
...
Latest checkpoint's REDO
Thank you for picking up.
is considering three cases: it got a 2-byte integer (and can continue on),
or there aren't yet 2 more bytes available in the buffer, in which case it
should return EOF without doing anything, or pqGetInt detected a hard
error and updated the connection error state
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Jaime Casanova ja...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:06 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
We can use
pg_xlogfile_name function to calculate that, but it cannot be executed in
the standby. Another problem is that pg_xlogfile_name
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 10:51, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Jaime Casanova ja...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:06 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
We can use
pg_xlogfile_name function to calculate that, but it cannot
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
Might it be a good idea to put it on it's own row instead of changing
the format of an existing row, in order not to break scripts and
programs that are parsing the previous output?
Good idea! What row name should we
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 8:44 PM, Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net wrote:
* Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote:
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 3:45 PM, Stephen Frost sfr...@snowman.net wrote:
Well, those numbers just aren't that exciting. :/
Agreed. There's clearly an effect, but on this
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 6:13 AM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
Might it be a good idea to put it on it's own row instead of changing
the format of an existing row, in order not to break scripts and
programs
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:51 PM, Atri Sharma atri.j...@gmail.com wrote:
Please let me know how to proceed further.
Waiting for your reply,
sure -- let's take this discussion off line. send me a private mail
and we'll discuss if/how we can get this off the ground.
merlin
--
Sent via
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 12:56 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 5:48 AM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
In streaming replication, after failover, new master might have lots
of un-applied
WAL files with old timeline ID. They are the WAL files
* Robert Haas (robertmh...@gmail.com) wrote:
Well, how do you want to look at it?
I thought the last graph you provided was a useful way to view the
results. It was my intent to make that clear in my prior email, my
apologies if that didn't come through.
Here's the data from 80th
Excerpts from Dimitri Fontaine's message of vie mar 23 11:05:37 -0300 2012:
=# \d pg_extension_feature
Table pg_catalog.pg_extension_feature
Column | Type | Modifiers
+--+---
extoid | oid | not null
extfeature | name | not null
Indexes:
Excerpts from Andrew Dunstan's message of jue mar 22 19:05:30 -0300 2012:
On 03/22/2012 05:49 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Robert Haas and I are disappointed by this change. I liked the fact
that I could post nice-looking SQL queries without having to use my
capslock key (which I use as a
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 06:05:30PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 03/22/2012 05:49 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Robert Haas and I are disappointed by this change. I liked the
fact that I could post nice-looking SQL queries without having to
use my capslock key (which I use as a second control
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 11:51:16AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Excerpts from Andrew Dunstan's message of jue mar 22 19:05:30 -0300 2012:
On 03/22/2012 05:49 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Robert Haas and I are disappointed by this change. I liked the
fact that I could post
Robert Haas rh...@postgresql.org writes:
Add notion of a transform function that can simplify function calls.
Why exactly was this thought to be a good idea:
* A NULL original expression disables use of transform functions while
* retaining all other behaviors.
AFAICT that buys nothing
Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of mié mar 21 21:50:24 -0300 2012:
heap_freeze_tuple() was apparently designed at one point to cope with
being called with either a shared or exclusive buffer lock. But none
of the current callers call it with a shared lock; they all call it
with an
On 22 March 2012 22:05, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
On 03/22/2012 05:49 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Robert Haas and I are disappointed by this change. I liked the fact
that I could post nice-looking SQL queries without having to use my
capslock key (which I use as a second
Are you going to provide a rebased version?
--
Álvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to
On 03/23/2012 11:07 AM, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
On 22 March 2012 22:05, Andrew Dunstanand...@dunslane.net wrote:
On 03/22/2012 05:49 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Robert Haas and I are disappointed by this change. I liked the fact
that I could post nice-looking SQL queries without having to
Peter Geoghegan pe...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On 22 March 2012 22:05, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
Should it be governed by a setting?
Perhaps, but I find the behaviour that was introduced by Peter's patch
to be a more preferable default.
FWIW, I like the new behavior better
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Robert Haas rh...@postgresql.org writes:
Add notion of a transform function that can simplify function calls.
Why exactly was this thought to be a good idea:
* A NULL original expression disables use of transform functions
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes:
Excerpts from Dimitri Fontaine's message of vie mar 23 11:05:37 -0300 2012:
=# \d pg_extension_feature
Table pg_catalog.pg_extension_feature
Column | Type | Modifiers
+--+---
extoid | oid | not
Greetings!
I've done a brief search of the postgresql mail archives, and I've noticed
a few projects for adding query caches to postgresql, (for example,
Masanori Yamazaki's query cache proposal for GSOC 2011), as well as the
query cache announced at http://www.postgresql.org/about/news/1296/
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 10:55:52AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Robert Haas rh...@postgresql.org writes:
Add notion of a transform function that can simplify function calls.
Why exactly was this thought to be a good idea:
* A NULL original expression disables use of transform functions while
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Why exactly was this thought to be a good idea:
* A NULL original expression disables use of transform functions while
* retaining all other behaviors.
I assumed that we were
Thom Brown t...@linux.com writes:
The new command triggers work correctly.
Thanks for your continued testing :)
Having looked at your regression tests, you don't seem to have enough
before triggers in the tests. There's no test for before CREATE
TABLE, CREATE TABLE AS or SELECT INTO. In my
Excerpts from Alexander LAW's message of mar mar 20 16:50:14 -0300 2012:
Thanks, I've understood your point.
Please look at the patch. It implements the first way and it makes psql
work too.
Great, thanks. Hopefully somebody with Windows-compile abilities will
have a look at this.
--
On 23 March 2012 15:13, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
Upper casing SQL keywords is a common style, which is used in lots of our
code (e.g. regression tests, psql queries, pg_dump). I think the default
should match what is in effect our house style, and what we have
historically
Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com writes:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 10:55:52AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Why exactly was this thought to be a good idea:
* A NULL original expression disables use of transform functions while
* retaining all other behaviors.
I did it that way because it looked wrong
Excerpts from Dimitri Fontaine's message of vie mar 23 12:26:47 -0300 2012:
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes:
Excerpts from Dimitri Fontaine's message of vie mar 23 11:05:37 -0300 2012:
=# \d pg_extension_feature
Table pg_catalog.pg_extension_feature
Column
Billy Earney billy.ear...@gmail.com writes:
I'm wondering if anyone would be interested in a query cache as a backend
to postgresql?
I believe this has been suggested and rejected several times before.
Did you look through the pgsql-hackers archives?
To invalidate cache entries, look at the
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 11:31:54AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 10:55 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Why exactly was this thought to be a good idea:
* A NULL original expression disables use of transform functions while
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes:
Why do features have OIDs? Is this for pg_depend entries? If so, would
it work to have pg_depend entries point to extensions instead?
Yes, for pg_depend, no I don't know how to make that work with pointing
to the extensions directly, because
I wrote:
However, see my response to Robert: why are we passing the original node
to the transform function at all? It would be more useful and easier to
work with to pass the function's fully-processed argument list, I believe.
After a bit of looking around, I realize that the current
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
The complication, opportunities for bugs, and general slowdown
associated with that would outweigh any possible gain, in the opinion
of most hackers who have thought about this.
I wouldn't be quite so pessimistic. I think the
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Greg Stark st...@mit.edu wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
The complication, opportunities for bugs, and general slowdown
associated with that would outweigh any possible gain, in the opinion
of most hackers who
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 9:41 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 6:13 AM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net wrote:
Might it be a good idea to put it on it's own row instead of changing
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 9:41 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 6:13 AM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Magnus Hagander mag...@hagander.net
Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com writes:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 11:31:54AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
... I've not looked
yet at the existing transform functions, but why would they want to know
about the original node at all?
You suggested[1] passing an Expr instead of an argument list, and your
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Greg Stark st...@mit.edu wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
The complication, opportunities for bugs, and general slowdown
associated with that would outweigh any possible gain, in the opinion
of most hackers who have
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 1:49 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 9:41 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 6:13 AM, Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 1:52 AM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
So we have this?
Master pg_controldata - OK txid_current_snapshot() - OK
Standby pg_controldata - OK txid_current_snapshot() - lower value
Are there just 2 standbys? So all standbys have acted identically?
Yes, I
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
The other thing that makes me skeptical of this proposal is that I am
not very sure that executing absolutely identical queries is a very
common use case for a relational database. I suppose there might be a
few queries
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 12:03 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Greg Stark st...@mit.edu wrote:
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
The complication, opportunities for bugs, and general slowdown
associated with that
Excerpts from Dimitri Fontaine's message of vie mar 23 13:12:22 -0300 2012:
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes:
Why do features have OIDs? Is this for pg_depend entries? If so, would
it work to have pg_depend entries point to extensions instead?
Yes, for pg_depend, no I
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:23:43AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Excerpts from David Fetter's message of jue mar 15 02:28:28 -0300 2012:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 12:06:20PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 10:22 AM, David Fetter da...@fetter.org wrote:
I think that instead
Hello,
It has been brought to my attention a few times over the last year that
I have been over the top in my presentation of myself and have in fact
alienated and offended many of the community. To be honest I am unaware
of everything I have done but I do take the opinion of those who have
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
What I think is more common is the repeated submission of queries that
are *nearly* identical, but with either different parameter bindings
or different constants. It would be nice to have some kind of cache
that would allow us to avoid the overhead
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Joshua D. Drake j...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Hello,
It has been brought to my attention a few times over the last year that I
have been over the top in my presentation of myself and have in fact
alienated and offended many of the community. To be honest I am
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Greg Stark st...@mit.edu wrote:
Well it's not entirely unlikely. If you step back a web application
looks like a big loop with a switch statement to go to different
pages. It keeps executing the same loop over and over again and there
are only a smallish number
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 11:38:56AM -0700, David Fetter wrote:
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 11:23:43AM -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
Excerpts from David Fetter's message of jue mar 15 02:28:28 -0300 2012:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 12:06:20PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 10:22
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Are you going to provide a rebased version?
Yes, working on that.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes:
Yes, for pg_depend, no I don't know how to make that work with pointing
to the extensions directly, because the whole point here is to be able
to depend on a feature rather than the whole extension.
Yes, I understand that -- but would it work
JD,
With that, I would like to apologize directly to this community that has
provided me with so much, not just professionally but personally.
Thank you for the apology.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 11:43:25AM -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
Hello,
It has been brought to my attention a few times over the last year
that I have been over the top in my presentation of myself and have
in fact alienated and offended many of the community. To be honest I
am unaware of
Excerpts from Dimitri Fontaine's message of vie mar 23 16:51:57 -0300 2012:
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes:
Yes, for pg_depend, no I don't know how to make that work with pointing
to the extensions directly, because the whole point here is to be able
to depend on a
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes:
So you still need an index on (oid), one on (extoid), and one on
(extfeature).
Yes. And the main use case for the index on (extoid) is listing a given
extension's features, that we want to order by their name, then the set
of indexes I've been
Marti Raudsepp ma...@juffo.org writes:
Per Tom's request, I split out this refactoring from my CacheExpr patch.
Basically I'm just centralizing the eval_const_expressions_mutator()
call on function arguments, from multiple different places to a single
location. Without this, it would be a lot
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 01:17, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I've applied a slightly-modified version of this after reconciling it
with the protransform fixes.
Cool, thanks!
I assume you are going to submit a rebased
version of the main CacheExpr patch?
Yeah, I'm still working on
I saw Kyotaro already answered, but I give my view as well.
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 06:07:16PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
AFAICT it breaks async processing entirely, because many changes have been
made that fail to distinguish insufficient data available as yet from
hard error. As an example,
Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2012 13:17:01 -0400
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Gsoc2012 Idea --- Social Network database schema
From: cbbro...@gmail.com
To: kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov
CC: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Kevin Grittner
kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov wrote:
62 matches
Mail list logo
