[HACKERS] 9.2 release schedule

2012-07-21 Thread Bruce Momjian
What are our plans for a 9.2 final release date? If we wait until September 1 to release our first release candidate, we will probably not release final until mid/late September. Is that what we want? -- Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.ushttp://momjian.us EnterpriseDB

Re: [HACKERS] Using pg_upgrade on log-shipping standby servers

2012-07-21 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On fre, 2012-07-20 at 13:11 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: I think the commands to run after pg_upgrade --link completes on both primary and standby might be as easy as: cd /u/pg/pgsql.old/data find . -links 1 -exec cp {} /u/pgsql/data \; Why would we want anything more

Re: [HACKERS] Resetting libpq connections after an app error

2012-07-21 Thread Martijn van Oosterhout
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 01:08:58AM +0100, Daniele Varrazzo wrote: Hello, apologize for bumping the question to -hackers but I got no answer from -general. If there is a better ML to post it let me know. In a libpq application, if there is an application error between PQsendQuery and

Re: [HACKERS] Using pg_upgrade on log-shipping standby servers

2012-07-21 Thread Bruce Momjian
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 11:24:21AM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote: On fre, 2012-07-20 at 13:11 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: I think the commands to run after pg_upgrade --link completes on both primary and standby might be as easy as: cd /u/pg/pgsql.old/data find . -links

Re: [HACKERS] 9.2 release schedule

2012-07-21 Thread Peter Geoghegan
On 21 July 2012 08:08, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote: What are our plans for a 9.2 final release date? If we wait until September 1 to release our first release candidate, we will probably not release final until mid/late September. Is that what we want? Personally I had hoped to see

Re: [HACKERS] Event Triggers reduced, v1

2012-07-21 Thread Robert Haas
On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 3:51 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 2:12 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: The Windows buildfarm members don't seem too happy with the latest patch. I'm looking at this now, but am so far mystified. Something's obviously

Re: [HACKERS] Resetting libpq connections after an app error

2012-07-21 Thread Tom Lane
Martijn van Oosterhout klep...@svana.org writes: On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 01:08:58AM +0100, Daniele Varrazzo wrote: In a libpq application, if there is an application error between PQsendQuery and PQgetResult, is there a way to revert a connection back to an usable state (i.e. from transaction

Re: [HACKERS] 9.2 release schedule

2012-07-21 Thread Tom Lane
Peter Geoghegan pe...@2ndquadrant.com writes: On 21 July 2012 08:08, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote: What are our plans for a 9.2 final release date? If we wait until September 1 to release our first release candidate, we will probably not release final until mid/late September. Is

Re: [HACKERS] [patch] libpq one-row-at-a-time API

2012-07-21 Thread Marko Kreen
Here is 2 approaches how to get to state where only PQsetSingleRowMode() is available. Both on top of REL9_2_STABLE branch. a) Remove callback hooks, keep rowBuf, implement single-row-mode on top of that. This was posted before, I just additionally removed the PQgetRowData() function.

Re: [HACKERS] 9.2 release schedule

2012-07-21 Thread Tom Lane
I wrote: Peter Geoghegan pe...@2ndquadrant.com writes: On 21 July 2012 08:08, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote: What are our plans for a 9.2 final release date? If we wait until September 1 to release our first release candidate, we will probably not release final until mid/late

Re: [HACKERS] [patch] libpq one-row-at-a-time API

2012-07-21 Thread Tom Lane
Marko Kreen mark...@gmail.com writes: Here is 2 approaches how to get to state where only PQsetSingleRowMode() is available. Both on top of REL9_2_STABLE branch. a) Remove callback hooks, keep rowBuf, implement single-row-mode on top of that. This was posted before, I just additionally