2013-03-29 02:46 keltezéssel, Tom Lane írta:
Since there has been some, um, grumbling about the quality of the
release notes of late, I've prepared draft notes for next week's
releases, covering commits through today. These are now committed
into the master branch for review, and should show up
2013-04-21 08:28 keltezéssel, Boszormenyi Zoltan írta:
2013-03-29 02:46 keltezéssel, Tom Lane írta:
Since there has been some, um, grumbling about the quality of the
release notes of late, I've prepared draft notes for next week's
releases, covering commits through today. These are now
2013-04-21 07:02 keltezéssel, Bruce Momjian írta:
I am not sure if Tom shared yet, but we are planning to package 9.3
beta1 on April 29, with a release on May 2. Those dates might change,
but that is the current plan. I have completed a draft 9.3 release
notes, which you can view here:
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 9:02 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
I am not sure if Tom shared yet, but we are planning to package 9.3
beta1 on April 29, with a release on May 2. Those dates might change,
but that is the current plan. I have completed a draft 9.3 release
notes, which
On 2013-04-20 22:36:32 -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 10:02 PM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
I will be working on polishing them for the next ten days, so any
feedback, patches, or commits are welcome. I still need to add lots of
SGML markup.
I've noticed
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 10:11 PM, Amit Kapila amit.kap...@huawei.com wrote:
On Wednesday, April 17, 2013 4:19 PM Florian Pflug wrote:
On Apr17, 2013, at 12:22 , Amit Kapila amit.kap...@huawei.com wrote:
Do you mean to say that as an error has occurred, so it would not be
able to
flush
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 7:49 PM, Florian Pflug f...@phlo.org wrote:
On Apr17, 2013, at 12:22 , Amit Kapila amit.kap...@huawei.com wrote:
Do you mean to say that as an error has occurred, so it would not be able to
flush received WAL, which could result in loss of WAL?
I think even if error
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 10:30 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
hlinnakan...@vmware.com wrote:
I just found out that if you use continuous archiving and online backups,
it's surprisingly difficult to restore a backup, without
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 10:36:32PM -0700, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
* Improve grouping of sessions waiting for commit_delay (Peter Geoghegan)
I think this should be under General Performance. It's definitely a
performance feature.
OK, moved.
--
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 09:34:10AM +0200, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
2013-04-21 07:02 keltezéssel, Bruce Momjian írta:
I am not sure if Tom shared yet, but we are planning to package 9.3
beta1 on April 29, with a release on May 2. Those dates might change,
but that is the current plan. I have
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 02:45:42PM +0400, Alexander Korotkov wrote:
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 9:02 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
I am not sure if Tom shared yet, but we are planning to package 9.3
beta1 on April 29, with a release on May 2. Those dates might change,
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 09:25:39AM +0200, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
doc/src/sgml/release.sgml suggest using the last one but when I looked at
release-9.3, I saw (AlvaroAacute;lvaro Herrera) in the webpage several times
where the sgml contains (Aacute;lvaro Herrera), so it's not bulletproof
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 08:28:22AM +0200, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
2013-03-29 02:46 keltezéssel, Tom Lane írta:
Since there has been some, um, grumbling about the quality of the
release notes of late, I've prepared draft notes for next week's
releases, covering commits through today. These
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 2:11 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
hlinnakan...@vmware.com wrote:
It seems that we're missing a setting, something like recovery_target =
'immediate', which would mean stop as soon as consistency is
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 5:54 AM, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Do we really want to generate just a warning for a checksum failure, and
not an error; see PageIsVerified().
Unless you turn on the parameter ignore_checksum_failure, you will get an
error. It will be generated by the
Bruce,
I don't see parallel pg_dump in the release notes. I thought that got
committed?
Anyway, see the pgsql-advocacy list for a longish discussion about what
we should consider the major fetures for 9.3.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
--
Sent via
On 2013-04-21 14:50:07 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote:
Bruce,
I don't see parallel pg_dump in the release notes. I thought that got
committed?
E.1.3.8.2. pg_dump:
Add pg_dump --jobs to dump in parallel when using directory output
format (Joachim Wieland)
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 10:11 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
hlinnakan...@vmware.com wrote:
I just found out that if you use continuous archiving and online backups,
it's surprisingly difficult to restore a backup, without replaying any more
WAL than necessary.
You can find first WAL file name in
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 3:11 AM, Heikki Linnakangas hlinnakan...@vmware.com
wrote:
I just found out that if you use continuous archiving and online backups,
it's surprisingly difficult to restore a backup, without replaying any more
WAL than necessary.
If you don't set a recovery target,
A few years ago I wrote a roll-your-own foreign-data-wrapper system for
Postgres because Postgres didn't have one at the time (some details
herehttp://unubtainabol.blogspot.com/2013/04/daves-foreign-data-introuction.htmlif
anyone is interested). Now I'm being tasked to move it to Postgres
9.2.x
20 matches
Mail list logo
