From: Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 8:12 PM, MauMau maumau...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for reviewing and testing the patch. Yes, at first I did what you
mentioned, but modified the patch according to some advice in the mail
thread. During redo,
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Peter Geoghegan p...@heroku.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 2:21 AM, Greg Stark st...@mit.edu wrote:
It does sound like the main question here is which opclass should be
the default. From the discussion there's a jsonb_hash_ops which works
on all input
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 12:24 PM, MauMau maumau...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com
If create_tablespace_directories() needs to handle with directory both on
Windows/Linux, then shouldn't it be a runtime check as in your first
version rather than compile time check?
I changed primary servers max_connections from 100 to 4 for just a
testing purpose. Now standby server won't start and complains:
hot standby is not possible because max_connections = 4 is a lower setting than
on the master server (its value was 100)
My guess is this is because standby's
From: Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com
The comments in your first version needs to be improved, as there
you just mentioned a Windows specific comment:
+ /* On Windows, lstat()
I think you can change comments (make it somewhat similar to
destroy_tablespace_directories) and then submit it as
On 21 March 2014 13:41, Tatsuo Wrote:
I changed primary servers max_connections from 100 to 4 for just a
testing purpose. Now standby server won't start and complains:
hot standby is not possible because max_connections = 4 is a lower
setting than on the master server (its value was 100)
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo
Section Inheritance
Allow inherited tables to inherit indexes, UNIQUE constraints, and
primary/FOREIGN KEYS
Good Morning.
I started to program a patch for inheritance of the foreign key constraints.
I. e. after applying the patch FKs are maintained
I changed primary servers max_connections from 100 to 4 for just a
testing purpose. Now standby server won't start and complains:
hot standby is not possible because max_connections = 4 is a lower
setting than on the master server (its value was 100)
My guess is this is because standby's
On 21 March 2014 16:17, Tatsuo Wrote:
In my case I had already changed primary's max_connections to 4 and
restarted it. So at that point both postgresql.conf of primary and
standby were 4.
If you changed max_connection to 4 only in primary, then I am not able to
understand, how it got
From: Mitsumasa KONDO kondo.mitsum...@gmail.com
2014-03-17 21:12 GMT+09:00 Fujii Masao masao.fu...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 6:23 AM, MauMau maumau...@gmail.com wrote:
* Improve the example in the
From: Rajeev rastogi rajeev.rast...@huawei.com
If you changed max_connection to 4 only in primary, then I am not able to
understand, how it got changed in standby also (if you have not taken back
again)?
Let me know If I have missed something.
The primary log the new value as an
The primary log the new value as an XLOG_PARAMETER_CHANGE WAL record
at startup when the parameter value in postgresql.conf does not match
the one in pg_control. Then, the WAL record is sent to the standby
and applied, which changes the value in pg_control on the standby.
Last time I tested
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 4:09 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Craig Ringer cr...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
Here's how I think it needs to look:
[ move all the functionality to the backend ]
Of course, after you've done all that work, you've got something that is
of exactly zero use to
From: Tatsuo Ishii is...@postgresql.org
Last time I tested in following way, max_connections in pg_control of
standby did not reflect the change in primary.
1) stop primary
2) stop standby
3) change max_connections to 4 in primary
4) change max_connections to 4 in standby
5) start primary
6)
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 8:54 PM, MauMau maumau...@gmail.com wrote:
* Create pg_copy in C so that it can be used on Windows as well as on
UNIX/Linux. It just copies one file. Its source code is located in
src/bin/pg_copy/. Please recommend a better name if you have one in mind.
I'd rather see
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 7:23 AM, Peter Geoghegan p...@heroku.com wrote:
I must admit that I'm coming around to the view that jsonb_hash_ops
would make a better default. Its performance is superb, and I think
there's a strong case to be made for that more than making up for it
not supporting
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 11:09 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Craig Ringer cr...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
Here's how I think it needs to look:
[ move all the functionality to the backend ]
Of course, after you've done all that work, you've got something that is
of exactly zero use to
We are working on a project in which we need to create tables for each
column. So which function should we call in recursion to create the tables?
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 4:54 PM, Behn, Edward (EBEHN) eb...@arinc.com wrote:
I've endeavored to enable the return of arrays of composite types from code
written in PL/Python. It seems that this can be accomplished though a very
minor change to the code:
On line 401 in the file
I had implemented similar code on top of FDW API.
https://github.com/kaigai/pg_strom/blob/old_cuda/utilcmds.c#L244
Probably, heap_create_with_catalog() is what you are finding out.
2014-03-21 22:57 GMT+09:00 Rajashree Mandaogane rajashree@gmail.com:
We are working on a project in which we
Andrzej Mazurkiewicz andr...@mazurkiewicz.org writes:
My patch need one change that might be of significance.
A type of the depencencies (pg_depend) among the FK constraint
(pg_constraint)
and the corresponding RI_ConstraintTrigger triggers has to be changed from
DEPENDENCY_INTERNAL to
On 03/21/2014 09:38 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 11:09 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Craig Ringer cr...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
Here's how I think it needs to look:
[ move all the functionality to the backend ]
Of course, after you've done all that work, you've got
From: Michael Paquier michael.paqu...@gmail.com
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 8:54 PM, MauMau maumau...@gmail.com wrote:
* Create pg_copy in C so that it can be used on Windows as well as on
UNIX/Linux. It just copies one file. Its source code is located in
src/bin/pg_copy/. Please recommend a
From: Michael Paquier michael.paqu...@gmail.com
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 8:54 PM, MauMau maumau...@gmail.com wrote:
* Create pg_copy in C so that it can be used on Windows as well as on
UNIX/Linux. It just copies one file. Its source code is located in
src/bin/pg_copy/. Please recommend a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi guys,
I realized that the output of the CREATE RULE has not a detailed
output for the events parameter.
But the question here is that I'm not sure which format follow:
{ INSERT | UPDATE | DELETE | SELECT}
or
INSERT
UPDATE
On 21 March 2014 03:45, Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 08, 2014 at 11:14:30AM +, Simon Riggs wrote:
On 7 March 2014 09:04, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
The right thing to do here is to not push to the extremes. If we mess
too much with the ruleutil stuff it
Andrew Dunstan escribió:
What would be useful for many purposes, and is a long-standing
project of mine that I still haven't found time to make progress on,
is that the server should contain functions to produce the creation
SQL for all its own objects, free of the locks that pg_dump requires
From: Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com
MauMau escribió:
The raw link only gave the mail in text format. I hoped to import
the mail into Windows Mail on Windows Vista, but I couldn't.
You might need to run a conversion process by which you transform the
raw file (in mbox format) into
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 02:02:50PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
The attached patch is slightly updated. I will apply it to head and all
the back branches, including the stylistic change to pg_resetxlog (for
consistency) and remove the MinGW block in head.
Patch applied back through 8.4. I had
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 04:11:12PM +, Simon Riggs wrote:
On 21 March 2014 03:45, Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 08, 2014 at 11:14:30AM +, Simon Riggs wrote:
Thanks for the review. I'll respond to each point on a later email but
looks nothing much major, apart from
Hi,
I've been annoyed at the amount of memory used by the backend local
PrivateRefCount array for a couple of reasons:
a) The performance impact of AtEOXact_Buffers() on Assert() enabled
builds is really, really annoying.
b) On larger nodes, the L1/2/3 cache impact of randomly accessing
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 12:12 AM, Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com wrote:
We added these ConstrCheck fields for 9.2, but equalTupleDescs() did not get
the memo. I looked for resulting behavior problems, and I found one in
RelationClearRelation() only. Test case:
set constraint_exclusion = on;
On 21 March 2014 17:49, Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com wrote:
+ * Be careful to ensure this function is called for Tables and Indexes
only.
+ * It is not currently safe to be called for Views because
security_barrier
+ * is listed as an option and so would be allowed to be set at a
On 21 March 2014 18:26, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
Given the minor symptoms in released versions, I lean against a back-patch.
FWIW, I'd lean toward a back-patch. It's probably not a big deal
either way, but I have a hard time seeing what risk we're avoiding by
not
On 21 March 2014 03:45, Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com wrote:
+ * Note that Hot Standby only knows about AccessExclusiveLocks on the master
+ * so any changes that might affect SELECTs running on standbys need to use
+ * AccessExclusiveLocks even if you think a lesser lock would do, unless you
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 3:23 AM, MauMau maumau...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
The PostgreSQL documentation describes cp (on UNIX/Linux) or copy (on
Windows) as an example for archive_command. However, cp/copy does not sync
the copied data to disk. As a result, the completed WAL segments would
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 06:53:27PM +, Simon Riggs wrote:
On 21 March 2014 17:49, Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com wrote:
alter table information_schema.triggers set (security_barrier = true);
I find it hard to justify why we accept such a statement. Surely its a
bug when the named
See http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/4afeab39.3000...@dunslane.net
This is still broken as of fairly recent HEAD; any objections to adding it to
TODO?
--
Jim C. Nasby, Data Architect j...@nasby.net
512.569.9461 (cell) http://jim.nasby.net
--
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Jim Nasby j...@nasby.net wrote:
See http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/4afeab39.3000...@dunslane.net
This is still broken as of fairly recent HEAD; any objections to adding it to
TODO?
Agreed: this is a major annoyance.
merlin
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers
On 03/21/2014 05:06 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 4:02 PM, Jim Nasby j...@nasby.net wrote:
See http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/4afeab39.3000...@dunslane.net
This is still broken as of fairly recent HEAD; any objections to adding it to
TODO?
Agreed: this is a major
On 21 March 2014 20:58, Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com wrote:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 06:53:27PM +, Simon Riggs wrote:
On 21 March 2014 17:49, Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com wrote:
alter table information_schema.triggers set (security_barrier = true);
I find it hard to justify why we
From: Jeff Janes jeff.ja...@gmail.com
Do people really just copy the files from one directory of local storage
to
another directory of local storage? I don't see the point of that.
It makes sense to archive WAL to a directory of local storage for media
recovery. Here, the local storage is
Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net writes:
Surely if it were really a major annoyance, someone would have sent code
to fix it during the last 4 years and more since the above.
The code would probably be pretty trivial, *if* we had consensus on
what the behavior ought to be. I'm not sure if we
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 4:28 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I'd be okay with swallowing a leading BOM if and only if client encoding
is UTF8. This should apply to any file psql reads, whether script or
data.
Yeah. The one case that doesn't solve is:
cat f1.sql f2.sql | psql ...
Why do we require a restart to change autovacuum_freeze_max_age? Can’t we
respawn the autovac workers to pick up the setting? (Or just pass the HUP down
to them?)
--
Jim C. Nasby, Data Architect j...@nasby.net
512.569.9461 (cell)
Hi,
I see you've committed this, cool. Sorry for not getting back to the
topic earlier..
On 2014-03-13 22:44:03 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 03/12/2014 09:29 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2014-03-07 17:54:32 +0200, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
So there are some unexplained differences
Merlin Moncure mmonc...@gmail.com writes:
There is no way for psql to handle that case though unless you'd strip
*all* BOMs encountered. Compounding this problem is that there's no
practical way AFAIK to send multiple file to psql via single command
line invocation. If you pass multiple -f
Hi,
On 2014-03-21 16:49:53 -0500, Jim Nasby wrote:
Why do we require a restart to change autovacuum_freeze_max_age? Can’t
we respawn the autovac workers to pick up the setting? (Or just pass
the HUP down to them?)
It's more complex than notifying the workers. There's limits in shared
memory
On 2014-03-21 22:52:33 +0100, Andres Freund wrote:
The committed version doesn't compile with LWLOCK_STATS...
Just noticed that it seems to also break the dtrace stuff:
http://pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=rover_fireflydt=2014-03-21%2018%3A04%3A00
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres
On 3/21/14, 4:55 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
Hi,
On 2014-03-21 16:49:53 -0500, Jim Nasby wrote:
Why do we require a restart to change autovacuum_freeze_max_age? Can’t
we respawn the autovac workers to pick up the setting? (Or just pass
the HUP down to them?)
It's more complex than notifying the
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 01:16:08PM -0700, Jeff Janes wrote:
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 3:23 AM, MauMau maumau...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
The PostgreSQL documentation describes cp (on UNIX/Linux) or copy (on
Windows) as an example for archive_command. However, cp/copy does not
Hello,
As people may know, I've implemented a relation cache mechanism on top of
custom-plan interface, that holds contents of a particular columns only, thus
it does not need to take storage access as long as user's query refers the
columns on in-memory cache.
The key factor of how this
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 12:12 AM, Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com wrote:
Given the minor symptoms in released versions, I lean against a back-patch.
FWIW, I'd lean toward a back-patch. It's probably not a big deal
either way, but I have a hard time
Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
On 21 March 2014 20:58, Noah Misch n...@leadboat.com wrote:
It's not the behavior I would choose for a new product, but I can't see
benefits sufficient to overturn previous decisions to keep it.
Speechless
The key argument for not fixing this is that
That's because the parameter is checked at the beginning of recovery
(i.e. at standby start) before XLOG_PARAMETER_CHANGE is received and
applied on the standby. Please see CheckRequiredParameterValues() in
StartupXLOG().
To persist the max_connections change:
1) stop primary
2) change
Hi,
I've created a table with 1000 partial indexes. Each one matches
exactly one row based on the predicate WHERE id = value.
However, when I perform an UPDATE of a single row in a transaction,
I've noticed that all those partial indexes show up in pg_locks with
RowExclusiveLock.
Only 2 of
On 03/22/2014 01:43 AM, Thom Brown wrote:
Hi,
I've created a table with 1000 partial indexes. Each one matches
exactly one row based on the predicate WHERE id = value.
However, when I perform an UPDATE of a single row in a transaction,
I've noticed that all those partial indexes show up in
On Mar 21, 2014, at 2:16 PM, Andrew Dunstan and...@dunslane.net wrote:
Surely if it were really a major annoyance, someone would have sent code to
fix it during the last 4 years and more since the above.
I suspect it's a minor annoyance :-)
But by all means add it to the TODO list if
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 12:56 AM, Emanuel Calvo
emanuel.ca...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
I realized that the output of the CREATE RULE has not a detailed
output for the events parameter.
But the question here is that I'm not sure which format follow:
{ INSERT | UPDATE | DELETE | SELECT}
or
On 22 March 2014 00:59, Vik Fearing vik.fear...@dalibo.com wrote:
On 03/22/2014 01:43 AM, Thom Brown wrote:
Hi,
I've created a table with 1000 partial indexes. Each one matches
exactly one row based on the predicate WHERE id = value.
However, when I perform an UPDATE of a single row in a
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 8:15 PM, Michael Paquier
michael.paqu...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 12:56 AM, Emanuel Calvo
emanuel.ca...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
I realized that the output of the CREATE RULE has not a detailed
output for the events parameter.
The list of events
Thom Brown t...@linux.com writes:
Is it necessary for a partial index that doesn't include the row to be
involved in locking?
Yes. You can't determine whether the index needs to get a new entry
without examining its metadata, and that's what the lock is mainly about.
The only possible
62 matches
Mail list logo
