Re: Noah Misch 2014-03-24 20140323230420.ga4139...@tornado.leadboat.com
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 11:52:22PM -0500, Noah Misch wrote:
On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 12:44:34PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
I'm inclined to suggest that we should put the socket under $CWD by
default, but provide some way
On Mar 28, 2014, at 2:41 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 02:54:26PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
I believe Bruce was suggesting to show it when it is set to *not* the
default, which strikes me as perfectly reasonable.
We
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 03:53:32PM -0300, FabrÃzio de Royes Mello wrote:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 02:54:26PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
I believe Bruce was suggesting to show it
Bruce Momjian wrote
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 03:53:32PM -0300, FabrÃzio de Royes Mello wrote:
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 3:41 PM, Tom Lane lt;
tgl@.pa
gt; wrote:
Bruce Momjian lt;
bruce@
gt; writes:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 02:54:26PM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
I believe Bruce was
make check in contrib/test_decoding actually does two regression runs,
one with pg_regress and one with pg_isolation_regress. These both use
the same (default) outputdir, so one overwrites the other, which is a
bit unfortunate from the buildfarm's point of view. I propose to make
them use
Interesting bug.
On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 04:34:41PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
I think we might be better off to get rid of toast_flatten_tuple_attribute
and instead insist that composite Datums never contain any external toast
pointers in the first place. That is, places that call
I realize this is an old thread, but seems to be the only discussion I can
find on this topic I have a problem with PQputCopyData function. It doesn't
signal some error.
I am using from within a c++ program:
PQexec(m_pConn, COPY... ...FROM stdin),
followed by
steve k steven.c.koh...@nasa.gov writes:
I realize this is an old thread, but seems to be the only discussion I can
find on this topic I have a problem with PQputCopyData function. It doesn't
signal some error.
PQputCopyData/PQputCopyEnd are only concerned with transferring data.
After
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 09:59:36AM -0700, David Johnston wrote:
As my belief is that 99% of the uses of \d are for human consumption
(because machines should in most cases hit the catalogs directly) then
strictly displaying Includes OIDs when appropriate has my +1.
Uses of \d+ in regression
On 03/29/2014 04:49 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 09:59:36AM -0700, David Johnston wrote:
As my belief is that 99% of the uses of \d are for human consumption
(because machines should in most cases hit the catalogs directly) then
strictly displaying Includes OIDs when
On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 2:22 PM, MauMau maumau...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Jeff Janes jeff.ja...@gmail.com
Do people really just copy the files from one directory of local storage
to
another directory of local storage? I don't see the point of that.
It makes sense to archive WAL to a
Jeff Janes jeff.ja...@gmail.com writes:
But, it is hard to tell what the real solution is, because the doc doesn't
explain why it should refuse (and fail) to overwrite an existing file. The
only reason I can think of to make that recommendation is because it is
easy to accidentally configure
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 05:10:49PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 03/29/2014 04:49 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 09:59:36AM -0700, David Johnston wrote:
As my belief is that 99% of the uses of \d are for human consumption
(because machines should in most cases hit the
On 03/29/2014 06:10 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 05:10:49PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 03/29/2014 04:49 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 09:59:36AM -0700, David Johnston wrote:
As my belief is that 99% of the uses of \d are for human consumption
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
Are you saying most people like Has OIDs: yes, or the idea of just
displaying _a_ line if there are OIDs? Based on default_with_oids,
perhaps we should display With OIDs.
I agree it is no unanimous. I am curious how large the majority has to
be to
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 01:48:33PM -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
On 03/29/2014 01:22 PM, Noah Misch wrote:
http://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=dromedarydt=2014-03-29%2007%3A02%3A48
Hmm. Can we use a location with a bit more head room than the
tmp_check/data directory? Maybe
steve k wrote
I realize this is an old thread, but seems to be the only discussion I can
find on this topic I have a problem with PQputCopyData function. It
doesn't signal some error.
I am using from within a c++ program:
PQexec(m_pConn, COPY... ...FROM stdin),
followed
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 06:16:19PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
Are you saying most people like Has OIDs: yes, or the idea of just
displaying _a_ line if there are OIDs? Based on default_with_oids,
perhaps we should display With OIDs.
I agree it is no
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 11:02:55AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 10:30:59AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 10:13:36AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 02:41:40PM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote:
On Saturday, March 29, 2014, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Jeff Janes jeff.ja...@gmail.com javascript:; writes:
But, it is hard to tell what the real solution is, because the doc
doesn't
explain why it should refuse (and fail) to overwrite an existing file.
The
only reason I can
On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 10:04:55AM +0100, Christoph Berg wrote:
Fwiw, to relocate the pg_regress socket dir, there is already the
possibility to run make check EXTRA_REGRESS_OPTS=--host=/tmp. (With
the pending fix I sent yesterday to extend this to contrib/test_decoding.)
That doesn't work for
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 1:17 PM, Amit Kapila amit.kapil...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 11:56 AM, Yugo Nagata nag...@sraoss.co.jp wrote:
Thanks for your a lot of comments. I revised the patch according to
comments from Robert Haas and Marti Raudsepp.
I have started looking into
Greetings,
Looks like we might not be entirely out of the woods yet regarding
MultiXactId's. After doing an upgrade from 9.2.6 to 9.3.4, we saw the
following:
ERROR: MultiXactId 6849409 has not been created yet -- apparent wraparound
The table contents can be select'd out and match
23 matches
Mail list logo
