On 10/04/15 21:26, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
On 4/9/15 8:58 PM, Petr Jelinek wrote:
Well, you can have two approaches to this, either allow some specific
set of keywords that can be used to specify limit, or you let sampling
methods interpret parameters, I believe the latter is more flexible.
On 04/10/15 21:57, Petr Jelinek wrote:
On 10/04/15 21:26, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
But this was not really my point, the BERNOULLI just does not work
well with row-limit by definition, it applies probability on each
individual row and while you can get probability from percentage very
easily
On 10/04/15 22:16, Tomas Vondra wrote:
On 04/10/15 21:57, Petr Jelinek wrote:
On 10/04/15 21:26, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
But this was not really my point, the BERNOULLI just does not work
well with row-limit by definition, it applies probability on each
individual row and while you can get
Hi
I wrote a prototype of this patch, and it works well
postgres=# set client_encoding to 'latin2';
SET
Time: 1.488 ms
postgres=# \copy (select xmlelement(name xx, d) from d) to ~/d.xml (format
'raw')
COPY 1
Time: 1.108 ms
postgres=# copy (select xmlelement(name xx, d) from d) to stdout (format
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 10:57 PM, Fabrízio de Royes Mello
fabriziome...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 10:15 PM, Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
Fabrízio de Royes Mello wrote:
On Mon, Apr 6, 2015 at 12:53 AM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@2ndquadrant.com
wrote:
At 2015-04-10 20:00:35, Michael Paquier michael.paqu...@gmail.com wrote:
Interesting. I think that for the time being you should add it to the
next commit fest to target an integration in 9.6 as these days we are
busy wrapping up the last commit fest of 9.5:
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/5/
