On Apr 13, 2011, at 2:06 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> "A.M." writes:
>> On Apr 11, 2011, at 7:13 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Robert Haas writes:
I mean I'm not convinced that fcntl() locking will be as reliable.
>
>>> I'm not either. Particularly not on NFS.
>
>> Is there an example of a recent sy
The goal of this work is to address all of the shortcomings of previous POSIX
shared memory patches as pointed out mostly by Tom Lane.
Branch:
http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=users/agentm/postgresql.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/posix_shmem
Main file:
http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb?p=users/a
On Nov 11, 2009, at 9:28 PM, Merlin Moncure wrote:
On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 5:48 PM, A.M.
wrote:
At least with this new payload, I can set the payload to the
transaction ID
and be certain that all the notifications I sent are processed
(and in order
even!) but could you explain why the co
