Hi there,
I guess many - if not most - here have tried
pgcluster. For those who didn't, postgresql is pretty
much the equivalent of pgcluster configured without
load balancer or replicator, in read-write standalone
mode. From a user point of view, that's three maximum
additional configuration file
> Support of PGCluster-I, which we're discussing here,
> is being dropped
> in favor of the shared-disk PGCluster-II which was
> demonstrated at the
> anniversary conference. IIRC, PGCluster-I does use
> command-based
> replication but is merged into the parser in such a
> way as to make it
> work
The idea of hooks sounds quite good to me indeed. The
issue is not PR, it's indeed pgcluster benefiting from
the maintenance of postgresql and avoiding the hassle
of having to resync its code at each postgresql
change.
I will propose something along those lines once I get
a more stable pgcluster an
'd be most happy to consider
it and try to find an accomodation.
Best regards
--- Jim Nasby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Adding -hackers back in...
>
> -Original Message-
> >From: Chahine Hamila
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Sent: Fri 8/25/2006 8:36
