Why not apply the effort to something already done and compatibly
licensed?
This:
http://dog.intalio.com/ots.html
Appears to be a Berkeley style licensed:
http://dog.intalio.com/license.html
Transaction monitor.
Overview
The OpenORB Transaction Service is a very scalable transaction monitor
Here is a sourceforge version of the same thing
http://openorb.sourceforge.net/
-Original Message-
From: Dann Corbit
Sent: Friday, October 10, 2003 9:38 PM
To: Christopher Browne; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 2-phase commit
Why not apply the effort to something
-Original Message-
From: Seun Osewa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2003 11:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [HACKERS] Dreaming About Redesigning SQL
Hi,
This is for relational database theory experts on one hand
and imlementers of real-world
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2003 7:10 AM
To: Marc G. Fournier
Cc: Hiroshi Inoue; Tom Lane; 'Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD';
'Andrew Sullivan'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 2-phase commit
Marc G. Fournier
Commercial systems use:
Mainframe:
CICS
UNIX:
Tuxedo
Encina
Win32:
MTS
DEC/COMPAQ/HP:
ACMS
Probably lots of others that I have never heard about.
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
A really nice overview of how various transaction managers are modeled:
http://www.ti5.tu-harburg.de/Lecture/99ws/TP/06-OverviewOfTPSystemsAndPr
oducts/sld001.htm
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an
-Original Message-
From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 9:27 AM
To: Bruce Momjian
Cc: Shridhar Daithankar; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Threads vs Processes
Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
One
-Original Message-
From: Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2003 1:23 PM
To: Bruce Momjian
Cc: Tatsuo Ishii; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Maximum table size
-On [20030909 20:32], Bruce Momjian ([EMAIL
-Original Message-
From: luke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 08, 2003 9:16 AM
To: Hackers
Subject: [HACKERS] pgsql vc++|win32
Hi guys, I'm planning with some friends to develop a
port of pgsql, to native win32 environment using vc++;
We read about MingW
Cygwin requires a license for commercial use.
-Original Message-
From: Peter Eisentraut [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 10:20 AM
To: Joerg Hessdoerfer
Cc: Bruce Momjian; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Win32 native port
Joerg Hessdoerfer
, 2003 11:36 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Win32 native port
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Dann Corbit wrote:
Use the Cygwin tools.
Cygwin requires a license for commercial use.
It does? I don't see it:
http://cygwin.com/licensing.html
Jon
-Original Message-
From: Jon Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 1:32 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Win32 native port
On Thu, 4 Sep 2003, Dann Corbit wrote:
Did you read this:
This means that unless you modify the tools so
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Dunstan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2003 2:35 PM
To: Postgresql Hackers
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Win32 native port
Dann Corbit wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jon Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
-Original Message-
From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2003 10:49 AM
To: Stephan Szabo
Cc: PostgreSQL-development
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] 7.4Beta
Stephan Szabo wrote:
I don't know if there will be or not, but in one case it's a
-Original Message-
From: Andreas Pflug [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2003 11:36 AM
To: Dann Corbit
Cc: Stephan Szabo; PostgreSQL-development
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] 7.4Beta
Dann Corbit wrote:
Simplification of bulk operations can be very important
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 4:29 PM
To: Peter Eisentraut
Cc: Lee Kindness; Larry Rosenman; PostgreSQL Development
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Thread-safe configuration option appears to
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Philip Yarra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 5:17 PM
To: Bruce Momjian
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 7.4 feature freeze is here
On Thu, 3 Jul 2003 12:14 am, you wrote:
I usually do it, but it might take a week
-Original Message-
From: The Hermit Hacker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2003 6:10 PM
To: Dann Corbit
Cc: The Hermit Hacker; Jan Wieck; scott.marlowe; Bruce
Momjian; Tom Lane; Jason Earl; PostgreSQL-development
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] Two weeks to feature freeze
-Original Message-
From: The Hermit Hacker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2003 12:30 PM
To: Jan Wieck
Cc: The Hermit Hacker; Dann Corbit; Tom Lane; Jason Earl;
PostgreSQL-development
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Two weeks to feature freeze
On Sun, 22 Jun 2003, Jan
-Original Message-
From: Jan Wieck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 22, 2003 5:45 AM
To: Dann Corbit
Cc: Tom Lane; Jason Earl; PostgreSQL-development
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Two weeks to feature freeze
Dann Corbit wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Tom Lane
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2003 8:50 PM
To: Dann Corbit
Cc: Tom Lane; Jason Earl; PostgreSQL-development
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Two weeks to feature freeze
Dann Corbit wrote:
That is the worst possible test plan
-Original Message-
From: scott.marlowe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 12:25 PM
To: Dann Corbit
Cc: Bruce Momjian; Tom Lane; Jason Earl; PostgreSQL-development
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Two weeks to feature freeze
On Mon, 23 Jun 2003, Dann Corbit wrote
-Original Message-
From: Nigel J. Andrews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 1:30 PM
To: Dann Corbit
Cc: scott.marlowe; Bruce Momjian; Tom Lane; Jason Earl;
PostgreSQL-development
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Two weeks to feature freeze
[snip]
So you've never worked
-Original Message-
From: Jan Wieck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 10:10 PM
To: scott.marlowe
Cc: Dann Corbit; Bruce Momjian; Tom Lane; Jason Earl;
PostgreSQL-development
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Two weeks to feature freeze
scott.marlowe wrote:
On Mon
Here is a list of a small sample of the citations available from the ACM
on software testing:
http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=581358coll=portaldl=ACMCFID=657
0092CFTOKEN=81653602
http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=376180coll=portaldl=ACMCFID=657
0092CFTOKEN=81653602
-Original Message-
From: Jan Wieck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 10:30 PM
To: Dann Corbit
Cc: scott.marlowe; Bruce Momjian; Tom Lane; Jason Earl;
PostgreSQL-development
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Two weeks to feature freeze
[snip]
I personally think you don't
-Original Message-
From: Josh Berkus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 10:50 PM
To: Dann Corbit; Jan Wieck
Cc: scott.marlowe; Bruce Momjian; Tom Lane; Jason Earl;
PostgreSQL-development
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Two weeks to feature freeze
Dann,
Astute
-Original Message-
From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 11:47 PM
To: Dann Corbit
Cc: Jason Earl; PostgreSQL-development
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Two weeks to feature freeze
Dann Corbit [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Look at this:
http
-Original Message-
From: Jason Earl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 10:45 AM
To: The Hermit Hacker
Cc: Robert Treat; Tom Lane; Christopher Kings-Lynne; Bruce
Momjian; PostgreSQL-development
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Two weeks to feature freeze
The Hermit
-Original Message-
From: Jason Earl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 3:32 PM
To: Dann Corbit
Cc: Jason Earl; The Hermit Hacker; PostgreSQL-development
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Two weeks to feature freeze
Dann Corbit [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why couldn't
-Original Message-
From: Jason Earl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 4:43 PM
To: Dann Corbit
Cc: Jason Earl; PostgreSQL-development
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Two weeks to feature freeze
Dann Corbit [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
-Original Message
-Original Message-
From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 8:36 PM
To: Dann Corbit
Cc: Jason Earl; PostgreSQL-development
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Two weeks to feature freeze
Dann Corbit [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If there is no procedure
-Original Message-
From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 8:58 PM
To: Jason Earl
Cc: Dann Corbit; PostgreSQL-development
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Two weeks to feature freeze
Jason Earl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Hmm... I must have missed the huge
-Original Message-
From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 9:19 PM
To: Dann Corbit
Cc: Jason Earl; PostgreSQL-development
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Two weeks to feature freeze
Dann Corbit [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
...ROTFL... Crash-Me
-Original Message-
From: Alvaro Herrera [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 10:00 PM
To: Dann Corbit
Cc: Tom Lane; Jason Earl; PostgreSQL-development
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Two weeks to feature freeze
On Fri, Jun 20, 2003 at 09:25:08PM -0700, Dann Corbit wrote
[snip]
a program in /contrib linking to an LGPL lib has never been
an issue.
Linking to LGPL libs doesn't encumber the software linking to it.
If that is a real objective, I'm surprised.
The base source tree has always been as BSD pure as we can
make it ...
its never been kept
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Kings-Lynne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 8:54 PM
To: Hackers; Advocacy
Subject: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Tuning Results
Hi Everyone,
I have just completed a basic set of benchmarking on our new
database server.
-Original Message-
From: ow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 10:32 PM
To: Shridhar
Daithankar[EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Benchmarks
There's The Open Source Database
A financial database benchmark:
http://www.cs.nyu.edu/cs/faculty/shasha/fintime.html
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is how to get the FIPS benchmark. It measures CONFORMANCE rather
than performance:
http://www.itl.nist.gov/div897/ctg/sql_form.htm
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
http://archives.postgresql.org
The benchmark handbook:
http://www.benchmarkresources.com/handbook/contents.asp
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For Win32, in order to emulate fsync() we will need to call
FlushFileBuffers():
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/fileio/
base/flushfilebuffers.asp
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 1: subscribe and unsubscribe commands go
-Original Message-
From: Merlin Moncure [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 3:00 PM
To: Andrew Dunstan
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Win32 and fsync()
I'm having difficulty digging up the reference, but I think I recall
seeing something
-Original Message-
From: Andrew Dunstan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 03, 2003 3:31 PM
To: Dann Corbit; Merlin Moncure
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Win32 and fsync()
I'm not sure what the provenance of this code for _commit is
- I thought
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 12:21 AM
To: Lamar Owen
Cc: PostgreSQL-development
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Windows Build System - My final thoughts
Man, I go away for one day, and look what you guys get into. :-)
For MySQL:
There is no Cygwin needed. Period.
I did a build last night. Using nothing but Visual Studio with the
Intel C++ compiler for Win32.
Here is what got built:
E:\mysql-3.23.55dir /s *.dll, *.exe
Volume in drive E has no label.
Volume Serial Number is 7496-C335
Directory of
-Original Message-
From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 8:24 PM
To: mlw
Cc: Lamar Owen; Dann Corbit; PostgresSQL Hackers Mailing List
Subject: Re: [mail] Re: [HACKERS] Windows Build System
mlw [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Like
-Original Message-
From: Greg Copeland [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 10:39 PM
To: Dann Corbit
Cc: Christopher Browne; Justin Clift; Jeff Davis; PostgresSQL
Hackers Mailing List
Subject: RE: [mail] Re: [HACKERS] Windows Build System
On Fri, 2003-01
-Original Message-
From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2003 12:30 PM
To: Lamar Owen
Cc: Dave Page; Vince Vielhaber; Ron Mayer;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [mail] Re: [HACKERS] Windows Build System
Lamar Owen [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
-Original Message-
From: Jan Wieck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:47 AM
To: Peter Eisentraut
Cc: Justin Clift; Hannu Krosing; Bruce Momjian; Tom Lane;
Postgres development
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Win32 port patches submitted
Peter Eisentraut
-Original Message-
From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 3:15 PM
To: Steve Crawford
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Terrible performance on wide selects
Steve Crawford sent me some profiling results for
-Original Message-
From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 4:18 PM
To: Dann Corbit
Cc: Steve Crawford; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Terrible performance on wide selects
Dann Corbit [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes
[snip]
So (for instance) if you have 12 variable fields, you would
store 12 integers at the start of the record.
Additionally, you could implicitly size the integers from the properties
of the column. A varchar(255) would only need an unsigned char to store
the offset, but a varchar(8)
-Original Message-
From: Jan Wieck [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 4:04 PM
To: Emmanuel Charpentier
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [mail] Re: Win32 port patches submitted
Emmanuel Charpentier wrote:
Mingw and mingw-ported tools ?
-Original Message-
From: Hans-Jürgen Schönig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 10:54 PM
To: Brian Bruns; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [mail] Re: [HACKERS] Win32 port patches submitted
Brian Bruns wrote:
Problem is, nobody builds packages on windows
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 1:55 PM
To: Peter Eisentraut
Cc: Tom Lane; Jan Wieck; PostgreSQL HACKERS
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Dollar in identifiers
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Tom Lane writes:
Quite awhile
-Original Message-
From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 09, 2003 2:27 PM
To: Jan Wieck
Cc: Bruce Momjian; Peter Eisentraut; PostgreSQL HACKERS
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Dollar in identifiers
Jan Wieck [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The problem is,
-Original Message-
From: scott.marlowe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 6:30 AM
To: Dann Corbit
Cc: johnn; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] [HACKERS] I feel the need for speed.
What am I doing wrong?
No analyze for 7.1.3.
Just ran
-Original Message-
From: johnn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 3:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] [HACKERS] I feel the need for speed.
What am I doing wrong?
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 03:10:06PM -0800, Dann Corbit wrote:
NOTICE
-Original Message-
From: Jean-Luc Lachance [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2003 2:43 PM
To: Tom Lane
Cc: Dann Corbit; Nigel J. Andrews;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] [HACKERS] I feel the need for speed.
What am I doing wrong
I have a query using two postgres tables.
One is called CNX_DS_53_SIS_STU_OPT_FEE_TB and the other is called
CNX_DS2_53_SIS_STU_OPT_FEE_TB.
I am getting 3 times slower performance than Microsoft Access when
performing a left outer join.
Here are the tables in question:
connxdatasync=# \d
-Original Message-
From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 5:27 PM
To: Justin Clift
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] OS/400 support?
Justin Clift [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We don't support OS/400 yet do we?
Never heard of it.
-Original Message-
From: Nigel J. Andrews [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 4:58 PM
To: Dann Corbit
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] I feel the need for speed. What am I
doing wrong?
Added -general list so that the next
-Original Message-
From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 5:26 PM
To: Nigel J. Andrews
Cc: Dann Corbit; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] I feel the need for speed. What am I
doing wrong?
Nigel J. Andrews [EMAIL
Title: Message
I have a machine
with 4 CPU's and 2 gigabytes of physical ram.
I would like to get
PostgreSQL to use as much memory as possible. I can't seem to get
PostgreSQL to use more than 100 megabytes or so.
How can I optimize
the use of PostgreSQL to get the maximum throughput in a
-Original Message-
From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, January 06, 2003 7:30 PM
To: Dann Corbit
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] PostgreSQL and memory usage
Dann Corbit [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have a machine with 4 CPU's
-Original Message-
From: mlw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 12:47 PM
To: Shridhar Daithankar
Cc: PGHackers
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Threads
Please no threading threads!!!
Has anyone calculated the interval and period of PostgreSQL needs
threads
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 7:58 PM
To: Joe Conway
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; PostgreSQL-development
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] more compile warnings
Rod, can you comment on these warnings Joe Conway's compiler
is
I am curious as to why it is necessary to add PL/pgSQL as a language
instead of including it by default.
Is it to save space on small systems or???
Since the code necessary PL/pgSQL is very small, it does not seem like
there would be much savings. I imagine that there is occasionally some
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 9:10 PM
To: Michael Meskes
Cc: PostgreSQL Hacker; Marc G. Fournier
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 7.3beta and ecpg
I think we should stop playing around with ecpg. Let's get
the
-Original Message-
From: Rod Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 10:55 AM
To: Steve Howe
Cc: PostgreSQL-development
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Rule updates and PQcmdstatus() issue
existed, had a brief discussion on the subject, and
couldn't reach
-Original Message-
From: Ross J. Reedstrom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:26 PM
To: Dann Corbit
Cc: Rod Taylor; Steve Howe; PostgreSQL-development
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Rule updates and PQcmdstatus() issue
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 11:30:52AM
-Original Message-
From: Tom Lane [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 9:07 PM
To: Alvaro Herrera
Cc: Gordon Runkle; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [7.3devl] Using PGPASSWORDFILE with
psql requires -U
Alvaro Herrera [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
-Original Message-
From: Lamar Owen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 26, 2002 10:50 AM
To: Bruce Momjian; Tom Lane
Cc: Sir Mordred The Traitor; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] @(#)Mordred Labs advisory 0x0007:
Remove DoS in PostgreSQL
On Monday 26
-Original Message-
From: Neil Conway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 1:44 PM
To: Vince Vielhaber
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] @(#)Mordred Labs advisory 0x0003:
Buffer overflow in PostgreSQL (fwd)
Vince Vielhaber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Vince Vielhaber [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 1:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [HACKERS] @(#)Mordred Labs advisory 0x0004: Multiple
buffer overflows inPostgreSQL. (fwd)
And another one. Sure would be nice if
-Original Message-
From: Frank Wiles [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 1:57 PM
To: Dann Corbit
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] @(#)Mordred Labs advisory 0x0004:
Multiple buffer overflows inPostgreSQL. (fwd)
.--[ Dann Corbit wrote
-Original Message-
From: Neil Conway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 10:22 PM
To: Mark Pritchard
Cc: Justin Clift; Tom Lane; Christopher Kings-Lynne;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] @(#) Mordred Labs advisory 0x0001:
Buffer overflow in
-Original Message-
From: Neil Conway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 10:42 PM
To: Dann Corbit
Cc: Neil Conway; Mark Pritchard; Justin Clift; Tom Lane;
Christopher Kings-Lynne; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] @(#) Mordred Labs advisory 0x0001
-Original Message-
From: Neil Conway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 19, 2002 10:48 PM
To: Dann Corbit
Cc: Neil Conway; Mark Pritchard; Justin Clift; Tom Lane;
Christopher Kings-Lynne; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] @(#) Mordred Labs advisory 0x0001
-Original Message-
From: Joe Conway [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, August 09, 2002 4:04 PM
To: Peter Eisentraut
Cc: pgsql-hackers
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: stand-alone composite types
Peter Eisentraut wrote:
Joe Conway writes:
3. Modify CREATE FUNCTION to
To: Dann Corbit
Cc: Tom Lane; PostgreSQL-development
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Open 7.3 items
If you can contribute it, I think it would be valuable to the
two other
Win32 projects that are working on porting the 7.3 code to Win32.
I don't think they will have any code ready for 7.3
On generic recovery...
What is wrong with this strategy...
0. Put the database in single user mode.
1. Dump the Schema, with creation order properly defined, and with all
constraints written to a separate file. (IOW, one file contains the
bare tables with no index, constraint or trigger
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 05, 2002 7:59 PM
To: PostgreSQL-development
Subject: [HACKERS] Thread discussion
There was an interesting thread/process discussion in the gproff
Slashdot discussion:
-Original Message-
From: Josh Berkus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2002 9:18 AM
To: Curt Sampson; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Democracy and organisation : let's make a
Curt,
You do point out some good areas in which PostgreSQL needs to
I think that the people on this list tend to make a mistake.
They try to pick apart the competition by focusing on their weak points.
From a growth standpoint, I think it is a much better idea to focus on
their strong points. Look at the things each competitor can do best.
Try to think of ways
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 9:52 AM
To: Tom Lane
Cc: Neil Conway; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Dann Corbit;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] What is wrong with hashed index usage?
Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 1:31 PM
To: Dann Corbit
Cc: Tom Lane; Neil Conway; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] What is wrong with hashed index usage?
Dann Corbit wrote:
I
Here are some class notes that contain some very good ideas with
terrific explanations:
http://www.cs.duke.edu/education/courses/fall01/cps216/
---(end of broadcast)---
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
PostgreSQL 7.2.1...
We have:
C:\CYGWIN\USR\SRC\POSTGRESQL-7.2.1-1\src\include\utils\catcache.h(84):ex
tern MemoryContext CacheMemoryContext;
C:\CYGWIN\USR\SRC\POSTGRESQL-7.2.1-1\src\include\utils\memutils.h(70):ex
tern DLLIMPORT MemoryContext CacheMemoryContext;
They cannot both be correct.
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2002 11:13 AM
To: Michael Meskes
Cc: PostgreSQL Hacker
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] ECPG won't compile anymore
Michael Meskes wrote:
On Tue, Jun 18, 2002 at 10:29:10AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Michael Meskes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 3:06 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostGres Doubt
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 11:46:47AM -0700, Dann Corbit wrote:
I should apologize for being rather harsh about
-Original Message-
From: Michael Meskes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 5:41 AM
To: Dann Corbit
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostGres Doubt
On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 02:08:22PM -0700, Dann Corbit wrote:
ECPG is single threading. Hence
I should apologize for being rather harsh about embedded SQL for
PostgreSQL.
To be fair, it does function and it certainly isn't trivial to
implement. I am sure that those who have worked on this project have
invested very many hours of blood, sweat and tears making it work.
I actually spent a
Deletion of data from a PostgreSQL table is very slow.
It would be nice to have a very fast delete like truncate table.
Now, truncate is a very dangerous command because it is not logged (but
the same is true for other operations like bulk copy and select into).
So one needs to be careful how
-Original Message-
From: Larry Rosenman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 12:36 PM
To: Dann Corbit
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Feature request: Truncate table
On Wed, 2002-06-12 at 14:32, Dann Corbit wrote:
Deletion of data from
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 2:42 PM
To: Dann Corbit
Cc: Michael Meskes; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostGres Doubt
Dann Corbit wrote:
I should apologize for being rather harsh about embedded SQL
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Momjian [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 3:20 PM
To: Dann Corbit
Cc: Michael Meskes; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostGres Doubt
Dann Corbit
I assume this is because you wrote your code assuming a
feature
Are you using crypt on the connection?
Unfortunately, crypt is not reentrant.
-Original Message-
From: David Ford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 6:16 PM
To: Dann Corbit
Cc: vikas p verma; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostGres Doubt
Is libpq
-Original Message-
From: vikas p verma [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2002 1:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [HACKERS] PostGres Doubt
Hi ,
I am extremely new to PostGreSql. If any one can please answer
this question of mine. I want to insert/update
301 - 400 of 433 matches
Mail list logo
