Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] could not reattach to shared memory on Windows

2010-02-08 Thread Etienne Dube
Hi, We've come across this issue on 8.2.15 on a Windows Server 2008 instance. I noticed the patch hasn't been applied to the 8.2 branch yet. Any chances that this will be part of an eventual 8.2.16 release? Do you need more testing and feedback before commiting the patch? Thanks, Etienne

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] could not reattach to shared memory on Windows

2010-02-09 Thread Etienne Dube
the problem. Nevertheless, I'll try to reproduce the issue under a Win2008 SP1 VM to see whether the patch makes a difference. 8.2.x win32 binaries are built using MinGW right? Etienne 2010/2/8 Etienne Dube etd...@gmail.com: Hi, We've come across this issue on 8.2.15 on a Windows

Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] could not reattach to shared memory on Windows

2010-07-20 Thread Etienne Dube
On 09/02/2010 4:09 PM, Etienne Dube wrote: Magnus Hagander wrote: IIRC, we've had zero reports on whether the patch worked at all on 8.2 in an environment where the problem actually existed. So yes, some testing and feedback would be much apprecaited. //Magnus Thanks for your quick reply. We

Re: [HACKERS] Postgres as Historian

2010-08-02 Thread Etienne Dube
On 02/08/2010 3:20 AM, Hardik Belani wrote: We are using postgres as RDBMS for our product. There is a requirement coming for a feature which will require me to store data about various data points (mainly numbers) on a time scale. Data measurement is being taken every few secs/mins based and