[HACKERS] Bug in libpq implentation and omission in documentation?

2012-08-08 Thread Jim Vanns
a restriction on the number of parameters permitted in PQexecParams(). Could someone either verify or correct me before I submit an official bug report!? Regards, Jim Vanns -- Jim Vanns Systems Programmer Framestore -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To

Re: [HACKERS] Bug in libpq implentation and omission in documentation?

2012-08-08 Thread Jim Vanns
00, Dmitriy Igrishin wrote: > Hey Jim, > > 2012/8/8 Jim Vanns > Hello PG hackers. Yesterday I began diagnosing a peculiar bug > in some > production code that has been happily running for months. I > finally got > to the bott

Re: [HACKERS] Bug in libpq implentation and omission in documentation?

2012-08-08 Thread Jim Vanns
On Wed, 2012-08-08 at 14:24 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote: > On 08.08.2012 12:36, Jim Vanns wrote: > > Ah ha. Yes, you're correct. It does mention here that an Int16 is used > > to specify the number of parameter format codes, values etc. > > > > I suggest then t