Hello,
While going through the TODO items on the wiki I have come across the
following proposal:
Provide a way to query the log collector subprocess to determine the
name of the currently active log file
Current log files when rotating?
://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Regards,
Kerem KAT
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 15:32, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Kerem Kat kerem...@gmail.com writes:
Corresponding is currently implemented in the parse/analyze phase. If
it were to be implemented in the planning phase, explain output would
likely be as you expect it to be.
It's already
parse_coerce.c:coerce_type method. I will try to dig
deep on it.
Regards,
Kerem KAT
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 15:45, Erik Rijkers e...@xs4all.nl wrote:
(pgsql 9.2devel (25 oct) with your latest CORRESPONDING patch;
linux x86_64 GNU/Linux 2.6.18-274.3.1.el5)
Hi,
here is another peculiarity, which I think
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 23:20, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I wrote:
Kerem Kat kerem...@gmail.com writes:
Union with NULL error persists without the corresponding patch. Here
is the output from postgres without the patch:
SELECT a FROM (SELECT 1 a) foo
UNION
SELECT a FROM (SELECT
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 20:52, Erik Rijkers e...@xs4all.nl wrote:
On Wed, October 19, 2011 15:01, Kerem Kat wrote:
Adding CORRESPONDING to Set Operations
Initial patch, filename: corresponding_clause_v2.patch
I had a quick look at the behaviour of this patch.
Btw, the examples in your email
/Linux)
This patch includes documentation and add one regression file.
This patch addresses the following TODO item:
SQL Commands: Add CORRESPONDING BY to UNION/INTERSECT/EXCEPT
Best Regards,
Kerem KAT
*** a/doc/src/sgml/queries.sgml
--- b/doc/src/sgml/queries.sgml
***
*** 1225,1230
clause. We do the same to op-rarg too.
There were no changes done in prepunion.c
There are documentation changes and one regression test in the patch.
Best Regards,
Kerem KAT
*** a/doc/src/sgml/queries.sgml
--- b/doc/src/sgml/queries.sgml
***
*** 1225,1230
--- 1225,1233
? Is there any
documentation available ?
Regards,
Aditi.
What kind of modifications do you want to do?
regards,
Kerem KAT
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
subqueries in the planner but it leads to the previous problem of column
ordering and view definition mess-up, and it would be too much bloat
methinks.
I can guess what needs to be done in prepunion.c, but I need a waypointer
for the parser.
tom lane: Thanks for your description
regards
Kerem KAT
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 18:49, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Kerem Kat kerem...@gmail.com writes:
There is a catch inserting subqueries for corresponding in the planner.
Parser expects to see equal number of columns in both sides of the
UNION query. If there is corresponding however
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 19:51, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Kerem Kat kerem...@gmail.com writes:
In the parser while analyzing SetOperationStmt, larg and rarg needs to be
transformed as subqueries. SetOperationStmt can have two fields representing
larg and rarg with projected columns
) SELECT 4 a, 5 c
a c
--
1 3
4 5
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 16:20, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 5:39 AM, Kerem Kat kerem...@gmail.com wrote:
I am new to postgresql code, I would like to start implementing easyish
TODO
items. I have read most
as if rtargetlist is never sorted.
Where the targetlist gets the column ordering? Apparently not while
targetlist is being lappend'ed (?).
regards,
Kerem KAT
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 17:03, Kerem Kat kerem...@gmail.com wrote:
I delved into the code without waiting for comments from the list just to
learn
you for your attention,
Any comments are welcome.
Kerem KAT
On Sun, Sep 18, 2011 at 12:39, Kerem Kat kerem...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I am new to postgresql code, I would like to start implementing easyish
TODO items. I have read most of the development guidelines, faqs, articles
by Greg
[,col2,...]])] to INTERSECT and EXCEPT operators.
Can anyone comment on how much effort this item needs?
regards, kerem kat.
16 matches
Mail list logo
