(5) Attempt to index the row
(6) If the first version of the row is in the index already (ver001) Don't
modify the index, otherwise, add the new version (just as before)
This looks OK, I guess. I wouldn't know about locking...
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org
referenced key
value does not change.
I think we recently changed the code to always scan an index a page at
a time so maybe scans no longer stop in the middle of a page anymore...
Or perhaps that was VACUUM only.
Have a noce day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http://svana.org/kleptog
there's a filter command
to strip libraries not needed. One of them is libz.
From src/backend/Makefile:
# The backend doesn't need everything that's in LIBS, however
LIBS := $(filter-out -lz -lreadline -ledit -ltermcap -lncurses -lcurses,
$(LIBS))
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout
to create a plan for SPI.
10x.
I imagine SPI_prepare() and SPI_execp() would be used for this.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http://svana.org/kleptog/
From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to
litigate.
signature.asc
Description
addressed...
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http://svana.org/kleptog/
From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to
litigate.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
arguments, thus you could push them straight to SPI_execp(). But you
seem to be suggesting parts of the actual query are in datum form also?
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http://svana.org/kleptog/
From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability
version that used the Postgres buffer cache and file
management.
Another possibility is something like tdb.
Basically, I'm not sure what all of this has to do with the core goal
of Postgres, which is to be an SQL compliant database.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org
On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 06:10:33PM +0300, Tzahi Fadida wrote:
On Friday 23 June 2006 17:47, Martijn van Oosterhout wrote:
On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 05:12:14PM +0300, Tzahi Fadida wrote:
My initial reasoning was to avoid extra sorts but i guess that the
planner just doesn't get the LIMIT 1
wouldn't apply
anyway (otherwise it could be done by hand).
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http://svana.org/kleptog/
From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to
litigate.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
this test is so unreliable we
won't even emit a warning...
[1] http://www.haible.de/bruno/packages-libcharset.html
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http://svana.org/kleptog/
From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to
litigate
that with an illegal instruction or the special
one-byte INT3 instruction x86 system have for this purpose.
With a 17-stage pipelined processor I imagine the cost of a no-op would
indeed be almost unmeasurable (increase code size I suppose).
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog
of context over 10 MB )
dump_stack_trace()
Ofcourse, you might just miss the allocations you need to look at...
The backtrace_symbols_fd() function dumps straight to a file, if you
want to avoid cluttering up the logs.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http
is there or elsewhere...
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http://svana.org/kleptog/
From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to
litigate.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
it.
pgtypeoids.h sounds like a good name to me and it should be in the top
level.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http://svana.org/kleptog/
From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to
litigate.
signature.asc
Description: Digital
or ascertain.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http://svana.org/kleptog/
From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to
litigate.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
doing can't possibly work. To
override malloc/free, you need to load the library *before* the C
library. Having the postmaster do it after startup is way too late.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http://svana.org/kleptog/
From each according to his ability
pg_class into the
catcache?
Your suggestion sounds like a good one...
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http://svana.org/kleptog/
From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to
litigate.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
we want SIGPROF, SIGALRM or SIGVTALRM? There's apparently a
distinction, see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SIGPROF
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http://svana.org/kleptog/
From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to
litigate
what
you're asking here...
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http://svana.org/kleptog/
From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to
litigate.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
'\copy pg_namespace to stdout csv'
pg_toast,10,
pg_temp_1,10,
pg_catalog,10,{kleptog=UC/kleptog,=U/kleptog}
public,10,{kleptog=UC/kleptog,=UC/kleptog}
information_schema,10,{kleptog=UC/kleptog,=U/kleptog}
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http://svana.org/kleptog
the
situation.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http://svana.org/kleptog/
From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to
litigate.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
pgresStatus
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http://svana.org/kleptog/
From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to
litigate.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
was that it wasn't worth it.
That's my recollection too. I had something that supported HPUX for
example but it was decided not worth the effort (can't find it right
now though...).
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http://svana.org/kleptog/
From each according to his ability
programs that included print.c would only
ever see zero in that variable.
Maybe some other arrangement is possible. Maybe like you suggest,
declare the symbol in print.c and make the declaration in common.c an
extern. The end result is the same though.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout
a
write?
Have a ncie day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http://svana.org/kleptog/
From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to
litigate.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
they
also be read at SIGHUP? If so, should they be read only by the postmaster or
by all backends?
Good question...
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http://svana.org/kleptog/
From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to
litigate
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 05:46:23AM -0700, Luke Lonergan wrote:
Martin,
On 6/13/06 5:42 AM, Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org wrote:
Is it possible it may have something to do with the hint bits? There's
are a bunch of bits in the header to deal with speeding up of MVCC
tests
of this is an issue in the first place.
Have a ncie day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http://svana.org/kleptog/
From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to
litigate.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
there.
And ofcourse it's an almost guarenteed loss on systems that don't
require a syscall to set the proc title.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http://svana.org/kleptog/
From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to
litigate.
signature.asc
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 11:51:25AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org writes:
Any particular reason this can't be a normal table in pg_catalog which
you can select/update.
That doesn't do anything to help with one of the main problems: that
we have at least
it there?
Have a ncie day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http://svana.org/kleptog/
From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to
litigate.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 02:08:12PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org writes:
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 12:32:22PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
I think we should try very hard to get rid of the longjmp in the signal
handler altogether.
I submitted a patch
, this probably would've been done
already. Fix that, and the index itself will appear shortly
afterwards...
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http://svana.org/kleptog/
From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to
litigate.
signature.asc
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 02:57:38PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org writes:
As it states in the comment, you can't remove the longjump because
it's the only way to break out of the read() call when using BSD signal
semantics (unless you're proposing non
On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 03:23:50PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org writes:
If you're asking me, yes. I use it a lot and would miss it if it were
gone. Is there another shortcut for abort current command and don't
store in history but don't clear it from
alternative) that scales with D, O^k(D) where any k 1 involves
a tradeoff with VACCUM.
That's why people suggest partitions. Then you only vacuum the
partitions that are new and the old ones never need to be touched...
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http://svana.org
backends. For existing ones
probably not.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http://svana.org/kleptog/
From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to
litigate.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http://svana.org/kleptog/
From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to
litigate.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
have to recompile to get the option you want.
Right now I'm confused though. I was under the impression the changes
were going to be ripped out because it was decided to be unworkable. I
think improvements can be made but I'm unsure if there's any
interest...
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van
.*?
The only irritating thing is that is only displays table, not other
objects...
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http://svana.org/kleptog/
From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to
litigate.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
if it doesn't
match real time. This puts us back to CPU cycle counters, but they have
drawbacks of their own.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http://svana.org/kleptog/
From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to
litigate
now I don't
think those commodoties are cheap enough to use like this for fairly
marginal benefits.
Beside, memory bandwidth hasn't grown anywhere enar as fast as memory
space, so it's always a good idea to use as little memory as possible.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog
how much time was spent in
each node, but you no longer have any idea about when they were entered
or left.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http://svana.org/kleptog/
From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to
litigate.
signature.asc
| perl -lne 'BEGIN { $last=0; $sum =0 }
/: (\d+) usec in iter (\d+)/ do { $sum += ($2-$last)*$1; $last=$2 };
END { print $sum\n }'
I propose we revert this patch and think about an interrupt-driven
sampling method instead.
That's another possibility ofcourse...
--
Martijn van Oosterhout
On Wed, Jun 07, 2006 at 04:04:33PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org writes:
Anyway, as a test, if you take the approach that the measurement at
item X only applies to the tuples immediately preceding it, for the
data you posted you get a result of 0.681148
it
guesses. SampleOverhead would be good too.
I know my version produced sensible results on my machine and the
handful of people testing, so I'll try it again with your changes, see
how it looks...
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http://svana.org/kleptog/
From each
query, got results.
3. Next, I uncommented that part, and ran the same query again. I GOT THE
RESULTS.
Did you rerun make install and restart the postmaster between each run?
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http://svana.org/kleptog/
From each according to his
suggest a much more careful correction method that works for
non-linear timing patterns...
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http://svana.org/kleptog/
From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to
litigate.
signature.asc
Description
this helps,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http://svana.org/kleptog/
From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to
litigate.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
using it for.
Hope this helps,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http://svana.org/kleptog/
From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to
litigate.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 05:33:44PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org writes:
While you do have a good point about non-binary modules, our module
handling need some help IMHO. For example, the current hack for CREATE
LANGUAGE to fix things caused by old pg_dumps
the breakage more concentrated. At the very least it ought
to be a WARNING immediately, because a LOG message is just not visible
enough.
If you like I can send a patch that adds it to all of contrib and some
of the other places required so that make check passes...
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van
a slimmed-down copy of the
up-to-date output.
Not sure whether it's worth it, but this sed line strips the POD docs:
sed -e '/^=/,/^=cut/d' ppport.h
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http://svana.org/kleptog/
From each according to his ability. To each according
,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http://svana.org/kleptog/
From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to
litigate.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 11:20:21PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote:
Uh. The installer does *not* include readline.
Terribly sorry, I misinterpreted the thread about it at the beginning
of the year.
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-02/msg00539.php
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van
, no effort has been put into
making it work...
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http://svana.org/kleptog/
From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to
litigate.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
, the posts just have to be
approved. How would we still do that?
I'm assuming we're talking about a list of valid To: addresses, not From:
addresses. That list should be fairly short...
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http://svana.org/kleptog/
From each according
On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 11:52:40AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org writes:
How about the suggestion of using a sequential index scan like the
recent changes to VACUUM in the case that there are no regular index
quals?
Nonstarter (hint: the solution we
for people watching at home.
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http://svana.org/kleptog/
From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to
litigate.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
catch a few more problems
of the same ilk.
Probably better actually, since by setting ntups to zero also,
PQgetvalue will return a warning (row number out of range) rather than
segfaulting...
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http://svana.org/kleptog/
From each
. You could then have whatever you want between them, perhaps
deferring the fetch step until just before returning the rows to the
client.
That's kinda what a bitmap scan does. Although, we never fetch tuples
unless you're going to use the result in some way...
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van
scan like the
recent changes to VACUUM in the case that there are no regular index
quals?
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http://svana.org/kleptog/
From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to
litigate.
signature.asc
Description
in. Ofcourse, it takes a few cycles to
determine that, but I don't think that'd cause a major slowdown.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http://svana.org/kleptog/
From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to
litigate.
signature.asc
On Sat, May 27, 2006 at 08:23:35PM +0300, Marko Kreen wrote:
On 5/27/06, Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org wrote:
Given there is no way to know if you're running single threaded or not,
I don't think glibc can take chances like that.
There's CPP symbol _REENTRANT for that and in run
machine (linux)
won't let me change them anyway, it changes the bits on the underlying
file. Is OSX different here?
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http://svana.org/kleptog/
From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to
litigate
users can customise...
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http://svana.org/kleptog/
From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to
litigate.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 05:16:59PM +0300, Marko Kreen wrote:
On 5/26/06, Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org wrote:
On Fri, May 26, 2006 at 08:21:56AM +0200, Hans-Jürgen Schönig wrote:
I got a bug request for the following unicode character in PostgreSQL
8.1.4: 0xedaeb8
ERROR
CREATE VIEW foo AS SELECT expr :: TIME WITH CHECK OPTION -- parse error
CREATE VIEW foo AS SELECT (expr :: TIME) WITH CHECK OPTION -- OK
Of course, any code that decompiles into SQL will have to be careful to
not produce unparseable SQL.
Have a ncie day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog
.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http://svana.org/kleptog/
From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to
litigate.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
and using a
new operator all over the place is not an option... How could I do this?
Can I accomplish this via another method?
Try this:
http://gborg.postgresql.org/project/citext/projdisplay.php
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http://svana.org/kleptog/
From each
PostgreSQL function from another.
It is clear enough from examples in the sources, but...
Hmm, documentation patches welcome...
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http://svana.org/kleptog/
From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability
and
$exp_localedir, which are not the same and pg_config.h gets one and
pg_config_paths.h gets the other.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http://svana.org/kleptog/
From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to
litigate.
signature.asc
,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http://svana.org/kleptog/
From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to
litigate.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
pg_dump upgrades across versions.
Anyway, it was just a thought and it didn't generate any comments at
the time.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http://svana.org/kleptog/
From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to
litigate
to be beneficial.
- Consider replacing pg_lzcompress with zlib if available. Or at least
test pg_lzcompress in a more realistic environment, because it seems
quite slow.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http://svana.org/kleptog/
From each according to his ability
without compression. The compression has cut the I/O wait from 10sec to
1.5sec at the expense of 5.5sec of compression time. If you had a
faster compression algorithm (zlib is not that fast) the results would
be even better...
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http
van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http://svana.org/kleptog/
From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to
litigate.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-contrib-8.1
Voila! Tsearch installed at your fingertips. What else were you
expecting?
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http://svana.org/kleptog/
From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to
litigate.
signature.asc
Description: Digital
?
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http://svana.org/kleptog/
From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to
litigate.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 09:03:31AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org writes:
I'm seeing 250,000 blocks being cut down to 9,500 blocks. That's almost
unbeleiveable. What's in the table?
Yeah, I'd tend to question the test data being used. gzip does not do
than
once I thought while waiting for stuff to compile: if I'd chosen mysql
I'd be done by now...
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http://svana.org/kleptog/
From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to
litigate.
signature.asc
,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http://svana.org/kleptog/
From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to
litigate.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
in contrib. Whatever you come up with might fit in well there...
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http://svana.org/kleptog/
From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to
litigate.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
not the only one. OpenSSL is an
optional part of most Linuxes, so there's no way you can use that
exception.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http://svana.org/kleptog/
From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to
litigate.
signature.asc
time. Any user can add their own
casts if they want, but the system generally only includes the ones
useful to many people or those required for standards complience.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http://svana.org/kleptog/
From each according to his ability
, and we assume a large sort with many
tapes, you're going to blow all your work_mem on buffers. If using
compression uses more memory so that you can't have as many tapes and
thus need multiple passes, well, we need to test if this is still a
win.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout
to arrange storage for this.
I have some ideas though, but as Tom says, should go for the quick and
dirty numbers first, to determine if it's even worth doing.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http://svana.org/kleptog/
From each according to his ability. To each
compress-whole-block
and decompress-whole-block.
zlib allows you to compress as the data comes along, keeping an eye on
the output buffer while you do it. For an initial test, using zlib
directly would probably be easier. If it works out we can look into
alternatives.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van
, if you
want all the result sets, you need to be looking at PQsendquery and co.
Have a ncie day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http://svana.org/kleptog/
From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to
litigate.
signature.asc
Description: Digital
/temp/compress-sort.patch
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http://svana.org/kleptog/
From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to
litigate.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http://svana.org/kleptog/
From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to
litigate.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
.
I'm assuming that what's actually being implemented is the SQL standard
method with the Oracle alternative being another way of specifying the
same thing?
Have a ncie day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http://svana.org/kleptog/
From each according to his ability. To each
, or
overestimating the cost of the hash join.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http://svana.org/kleptog/
From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to
litigate.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
should dramatically cut
the overhead of EXPLAIN ANALYZE. Perhaps you could try that and report
your experience.
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2006-05/msg00158.php
BTW, just showing the plan takes no time at all, just use EXPLAIN
without the ANALYZE.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van
,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http://svana.org/kleptog/
From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to
litigate.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
too hard, except
the whole logtape process kinda gets in the way. If it wern't for the
mark/restore it'd be trivial. Might take a stab at it some time, if I
can think of a way to handle the seeking...
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http://svana.org/kleptog/
From each according
it needs to support it there.
It might be easier to switch to giving each tape it's own file...
I don't think it would make much difference. OTOH, if this turns out to
be a win, the tuplestore could have the same optimisation.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http
look how
that works.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http://svana.org/kleptog/
From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to
litigate.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, May 15, 2006 at 11:17:41AM -0400, Jonah H. Harris wrote:
On 5/15/06, Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org wrote:
tableoid is a pseudo-column like you mean, perhaps you should look how
that works.
I thought tableoid was a system column with a physical representation
on the tuple
(). We don't use it and many OSes don't support it, but it
is there.
The O/S is some overhead, but the benefits outweigh the costs IMHO.
Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout kleptog@svana.org http://svana.org/kleptog/
From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability
901 - 1000 of 1563 matches
Mail list logo
