[HACKERS] NOTICE messages

2001-06-15 Thread Michael Meskes
. Michael -- Michael Meskes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL! ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send unregister YourEmailAddressHere to [EMAIL

Re: [HACKERS] NOTICE messages

2001-06-15 Thread Michael Meskes
using 7.1. But I will try to get some details. Michael -- Michael Meskes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL! ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command

[HACKERS] What happened to function textpos()?

2001-05-10 Thread Michael Meskes
I just updated my testsystem from 7.0.3 to 7.1 and tried to insert my production data just to notice that one function uses textpos(). 7.1 does not know about that function. Michael -- Michael Meskes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL

Re: [HACKERS] ecpg long int problem on alpha + fix

2001-04-05 Thread Michael Meskes
that if HAVE_LONG_INT_64 is defined then HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT_64 also is true, although not defined? Hmm, thinking about it, how about using long instead of long long if HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT_64 is undefined? Michael -- Michael Meskes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use

Re: [HACKERS] ecpg long int problem on alpha + fix

2001-04-04 Thread Michael Meskes
, just use "long int" instead. Or did I misunderstand something? Michael -- Michael Meskes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL! ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Re: [HACKERS] ecpg long int problem on alpha + fix

2001-04-04 Thread Michael Meskes
HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT_64 in the backend as well. Anyone else with more knowledge about HAVE_LONG_LONG_INT_64 dare to comment? Michael -- Michael Meskes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL! ---(end of broadcast

Re: [HACKERS] ecpg long int problem on alpha + fix

2001-04-04 Thread Michael Meskes
but I simply misunderstood you. Michael -- Michael Meskes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL! ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html

[HACKERS] CeBit

2001-03-07 Thread Michael Meskes
Is anyone on this list in Hannover for CeBit? Maybe we could arrange a meeting. Michael -- Michael Meskes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL! ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subscribe

[HACKERS] Re: Changes to include files

2001-01-19 Thread Michael Meskes
e/ipc.h:43: warning: type defaults to `int' in declaration of `IpcSemaphoreKey' ... After that I get lots of warnings and parse errors in several include files. Michael -- Michael Meskes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!

Re: [HACKERS] Re: Changes to include files

2001-01-19 Thread Michael Meskes
On Fri, Jan 19, 2001 at 10:29:15AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: Did you get the update I made on 1/14 to #include "postgres.h" at the head of pgc.l ? No, that one is missing. Thanks. I'll add it immediately. Michael -- Michael Meskes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use

[HACKERS] Changes to include files

2001-01-18 Thread Michael Meskes
Could anyone please tell me what changed in some of the include files. I just noticed that ecpg won't compile anymore. Also I think we have yet to agree on the libpq/ecpg problem, or did I miss a mail yet again? Michael -- Michael Meskes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian

Re: [HACKERS] CVS problem

2000-11-07 Thread Michael Meskes
On Mon, Nov 06, 2000 at 08:59:38AM -0400, The Hermit Hacker wrote: what version of CVS are you running? when was the last time you did anything with it? It works again. I have no idea what failed. Michael -- Michael Meskes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux

[HACKERS] 7.1 and ecpg

2000-10-16 Thread Michael Meskes
What exactly do we do with 7.1 on Nov 1st? Freeze or release? I'm absolutely sure I won't finish ecpg until Nov 1st. Yes, I know I had similar problems with 7.0, but real life tends to take away too much time. Michael -- Michael Meskes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian

Re: [HACKERS] Suggested change in include/utils/elog.h

2000-10-10 Thread Michael Meskes
I haven't check carefully, but I don't think ecpg include elog.h directly. Maybe I just picked the wrong file to include. Michael -- Michael Meskes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!

Re: [HACKERS] ecpg enhance patch

2000-10-04 Thread Michael Meskes
On Mon, Oct 02, 2000 at 12:00:46PM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote: I have committed this patch. It offers a speed up to ecpg. Thanks. I haven't found the time to do it so far. But since I wanted to this is good news. :-) Michael -- Michael Meskes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use

Re: [HACKERS] Cannot compile

2000-09-18 Thread Michael Meskes
this but it's too weird to explain but I'll try to look at it. ;-) That was the solution. It's compiling right now. I never tried this because I thought make distclean would remove the depend files as well. Anyway thanks a lot. Michael -- Michael Meskes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein

[HACKERS] type OIDs

2000-09-15 Thread Michael Meskes
coding some types. I wonder if this will create problems. Michael -- Michael Meskes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!

[HACKERS] Cannot compile

2000-09-15 Thread Michael Meskes
on? Michael -- Michael Meskes [EMAIL PROTECTED] Go SF 49ers! Go Rhein Fire! Use Debian GNU/Linux! Use PostgreSQL!

<    2   3   4   5   6   7