> This is slightly different - FSF wants it so it will have a legal
> position to defend its programs:
There is at least one documented case where the FSF has used
that right to sell a non-open license for GCC to Motorola.
- Sascha Experience IRCG
On Sun, 18 Feb 2001, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> * Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010218 22:25]:
> > Just shoot it over to the PHP folks. Seems they are already on top if
> > it. I don't want to work around their normal system unless necessary.
> Their stuff seems to sit forever. I put it in t
On Sun, 18 Feb 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Just shoot it over to the PHP folks. Seems they are already on top if
> it. I don't want to work around their normal system unless necessary.
I've committed an autoconf check, so PHP 4.0.5 and upwards
will be compatible with existing and futu
> I don't believe you will break if that patch is applied now.
>
InvalidOid is not defined otherwise.
- Sascha
On Mon, 19 Feb 2001, Larry Rosenman wrote:
> * Sascha Schumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010219 07:42]:
> > > I don't believe you will break if that patch is applied now.
> > >
> >
> > InvalidOid is not defined otherwise.
> aha. Ok. PG-Hackers: Can
> AFAIK there is no need for you to be including in *any*
> Postgres release --- it's supposed to be an internal header file,
> not something that client applications need. Try it with just
/home/sas/src/php4/ext/pgsql/pgsql.c: In function `php_if_pg_getlastoid':
/home/sas/src/php4/ext/pgsql/pg
