Thanks for the replies and thoughts.
On 08/19/14 18:27, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
On 08/20/2014 12:17 AM, John Lumby wrote:
I am attaching a new version of the patch for consideration in the
current commit fest.
Thanks for working on this!
Relative to the one I submitted on 25 June in
bay17
On 05/31/14 20:44, johnlumby wrote:
On 05/30/14 09:36, Claudio Freire wrote:
Good point. I have included the guts of your little test program
(modified to do polling) into the existing autoconf test program
that decides on the
#define USE_AIO_ATOMIC_BUILTIN_COMP_SWAP.
See config/c
On 09/20/12 16:34, Tom Lane wrote:
John Lumby writes:
On Fri, 22 Jun 2012 09:55:13, Robert Haas wrote:
I do notice that the RETURNING clause of the INSERT can't reference
NEW, which seems like a restriction that we probably ought to lift,
but it doesn't seem to have much to do with your patch.
On 08/18/2012 10:11 AM, John Lumby wrote:
>
I've recently tried extending the postgresql prefetch mechanism on linux
to use the posix (i.e. librt)
aio_read and friends where possible. In other words, in
PrefetchBuffer(), try getting a buffer
and issuing aio_read before falling back to fpo
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2012 00:26:37 +0100 From: Peter Geoghegan
To: Jeff Janes Cc:
pgsql-hackers Subject: Re: tuplesort
memory usage: grow_memtuples Message-ID:
On 27 July 2012 16:39, Jeff Janes wrote:
>> Can you suggest a benchmark that will usefully exercise this patch?
>
> I think th
