Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] BUG #12989: pg_size_pretty with negative values

New patch attached and rebased on HEAD (8c75ad436f75fc629b61f601ba884c8f9313c9af). Am 03.11.2015 um 04:06 schrieb Robert Haas: > On Sat, Oct 31, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Julien Rouhaud > wrote: >> I just reviewed your patch, everything looks fine for me. Maybe some >> minor

Re: [HACKERS] [BUGS] BUG #12989: pg_size_pretty with negative values

Hi all, Am 06.04.2015 um 20:52 schrieb Tom Lane: > "David G. Johnston" writes: >> I'll let a hacker determine whether this is a bug or a feature request >> though it is a POLA violation in either case. > > I'd say it's a feature request --- a perfectly reasonable