Re: [HACKERS] plpython trigger code is wrong (Re: [GENERAL] Potential bug -- script that drops postgres server)

* Tom Lane ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [030214 19:35]: Lance Thomas [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Below is something that may be of interest -- a short, 7-statement script that seems to drop my postgres server. It appears that the plpython trigger implementation assumes that any given procedure will

[HACKERS] plpython attypmod broken in MODIFY trigger returns

In a plpython trigger, if you return MODIFY, the parsing of the TD[new] dictionary uses the wrong (c array) index to locate the atttypmod value, leading to subtle bugs dependent on the exact types, names, and order of fields in the table in question. (Types need to be those that use the typmod,

Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL index usage discussion.

* mlw ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020424 18:51]: (2) Use programmatic hints which allow coders specify which indexes are used during a query. (ala Oracle) We would certainly use this if it were available. Hopefully not to shoot ourselves in the foot, but for the rather common case of having a

Re: [HACKERS] Vote on SET in aborted transaction

* Bruce Momjian ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020423 12:30]: 1 - All SETs are rolled back in aborted transaction 2 - SETs are ignored after transaction abort 3 - All SETs are honored in aborted transaction ? - Have SETs vary in behavior depending on variable Our

[HACKERS] Patch to add real cancel to ODBC driver

Patch against 7,2 submitted for comment. It's a little messy; I had some trouble trying to reconcile the code style of libpq which I copied from, and odbc. Suggestions on what parts look ugly, and or where to send this (is there a separate ODBC place?) are welcome. This seems to work just

Re: [HACKERS] Suggestions please: names for function cachability attributes

* Tom Lane ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [020402 16:42]: Since I'm about to have to edit pg_proc.h to add a namespace column, I thought this would be a good time to revise the current proiscachable column into the three-way cachability distinction we've discussed before. But I need some names for the

[HACKERS] hackers mail broken?

Original titles: Patch to add real cancel to ODBC driver Patch to add real can--cel to ODBC driver Bruce, sorry to bother you, would you forward this onto the list? I can't post for reasons I can't fathom. - Patch against 7,2 submitted for comment. It's a little messy; I had some

[HACKERS] Proposed patch for ODBC driver w/ C-a-n-c-e-l

Patch against 7,2 submitted for comment. It's a little messy; I had some trouble trying to reconcile the code style of libpq which I copied from, and odbc. Suggestions on what parts look ugly, and or where to send this (is there a separate ODBC place?) are welcome. This seems to work just

Re: [HACKERS] Plpython bug with int8 - Found, need advice

, or is there an existing standard for factoring the body of the int8in function into a widely available utility location. Hope those questions are clear. I'd like to get a patch in before Beta. -Brad * Bradley McLean ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010929 01:55]: Can someone else run this and confirm the results

Re: [HACKERS] Pre-forking backend

* Gavin Sherry ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [010930 06:13]: On Sat, 29 Sep 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bruce Momjian [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: How hard would it be to pre-fork an extra backend How are you going to pass the connection socket to an already-forked child process? AFAIK

[HACKERS] Plpython bug with int8?

Can someone else run this and confirm the results against the tip of the CVS repository? I'm trying to trace this bug (help welcome too). (it was hidden in a trigger and a pain to narrow to this point) -Brad - drop function mul1(int4,int4); drop function mul2(int4,int4); drop function