Re: [HACKERS] GiST support for UUIDs

On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 1:13 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Pushed with that change and some other mostly-cosmetic tweaking. Thank you for addressing all those issues, Tom! I tested some exclusion constraints that are interesting to me, and everything seems to be working well. --

Re: [HACKERS] GiST support for UUIDs

On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 4:04 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > > What I would suggest is that you forget the union hack and just use > memcmp in all the comparison functions. It's not likely to be worth > the trouble to try to get those calls to be safely aligned. The > only place where

Re: [HACKERS] Proposal for better support of time-varying timezone abbreviations

On Tue, Oct 7, 2014 at 5:05 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: typedef struct { ! char token[TOKMAXLEN + 1]; /* now always null-terminated */ char type; ! int32 value; } datetkn; Being entirely new to this code, now makes me think of the current timestamp. I think this word can