Hi,
On 18 November 2016 at 08:18, Craig Ringer wrote: >At this point I doubt I'll be able to >get update it again in time for v10, so anyone who wants to adopt it >is welcome. I am interested in pipeline/batch support for ECPG, and found this thread. I updated Craig's patch [1] to apply this one to HEAD. Moreover, I fixed an easy typo. First, I'm changing PQqueriesInBatch() to work as documented. After that, I plan to reflect contents of reviews in the patch. On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 11:52 PM, Daniel Verite wrote: > Wouldn't pgbench benefit from it? > It was mentioned some time ago [1], in relationship to the > \into construct, how client-server latency was important enough to > justify the use of a "\;" separator between statements, to send them > as a group. > > But with the libpq batch API, maybe this could be modernized > with meta-commands like this: > \startbatch > ... > \endbatch I'm planning to work on meta-commands to support batch mode after committing this patch successfully. [1]https://github.com/2ndQuadrant/postgres/tree/dev/libpq-async-batch Regards, Aya Iwata FUJITSU
0001-Pipelining-batch-support-for-libpq-v3.patch
Description: 0001-Pipelining-batch-support-for-libpq-v3.patch
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
