Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL, NetBSD and NFS

2003-02-05 Thread James Hubbard
Justin Clift wrote: Hmmm... does anyone remember the name of that NFS testing tool the FreeBSD guys were using? Think it came from Apple. They used it to find and isolate bugs in the FreeBSD code a while ago. Sounds like it might be useful here. :-) You can find a write about it here: http

Re: [mail] Re: [HACKERS] Windows Build System

2003-01-29 Thread James Hubbard
.org registry. What we may think about Windows being fragile and being a piece of crap doesn't really matter. People are using it and it's at least doing they want. I've probably not said this before, but I appreciate all the hard work that everyone puts into this project. James Hubbard ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster

Re: [mail] Re: [HACKERS] Windows Build System

2003-01-29 Thread James Hubbard
ning these unscientific tests you're telling us about being so successful for "some months"? Vince. I open my mouth and insert foot: Where do I get any of these scientific tests to determine if the latest and greatest 7.3.x will not fall down on my favo

Re: [HACKERS] Democracy and organisation : let's make a revolution

2002-06-25 Thread James Hubbard
tly: How-to for using Open Office and unixODBC http://www.unixodbc.org/doc/OOoMySQL.pdf Others are considering MySQL. http://dba.openoffice.org/proposals/MySQL_OOo.html James Hubbard Dave Cramer wrote: > IMO One of the big reasons that MySQL is viewed as being better is it's > perc