On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 20:30, Kevin Fieldkevinjamesfi...@gmail.com
wrote:
The event viewer says:
The description for Event ID ( 0 ) in Source ( PostgreSQL )
cannot
be
found. The local computer may not have the necessary registry
information or message DLL files to display
On Fri, Jul 31, 2009 at 19:29, Kevin Fieldkevinjamesfi...@gmail.com
wrote:
%t LOG: received fast shutdown request
%t LOG: aborting any active transactions
%t LOG: autovacuum launcher shutting down
%t LOG: shutting down
%t LOG: database system is shut down
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 19:52, Kevin Fieldkevinjamesfi...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Win2k3 Std SP2, the service won't start once I've applied the
patch. In the log, I get:
%t LOG: CreateProcess call failed: A blocking operation was
interrupted by a call to WSACancelBlockingCall.
Now,
%t LOG: received fast shutdown request
%t LOG: aborting any active transactions
%t LOG: autovacuum launcher shutting down
%t LOG: shutting down
%t LOG: database system is shut down
That's the entire file. Attempting to start the service, I
almost
On Win2k3 Std SP2, the service won't start once I've applied the
patch. In the log, I get:
%t LOG: CreateProcess call failed: A blocking operation was
interrupted by a call to WSACancelBlockingCall.
(error code 2)
%t LOG: could not fork autovacuum worker process: A blocking
operation
I put the old binary back and it works fine.
For the record, fine meaning I've never had the shared memory
problem.
Kev
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
On May 29, 1:04 pm, t...@sss.pgh.pa.us (Tom Lane) wrote:
Kevin Field kevinjamesfi...@gmail.com writes:
default:
elog(ERROR, unrecognized raise option: %d,
opt-opt_type);
Should this be changed to:
default:
ereport(ERROR
On May 29, 12:43 pm, Kevin Field kevinjamesfi...@gmail.com wrote:
On May 29, 11:48 am, Kevin Field kevinjamesfi...@gmail.com wrote:
On May 29, 11:35 am, robertmh...@gmail.com (Robert Haas) wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 7:59 AM, Kevin Field kevinjamesfi...@gmail.com
wrote:
On May
On May 28, 5:19 pm, da...@kineticode.com (David E. Wheeler) wrote:
On May 28, 2009, at 12:53 PM, Kevin Field wrote:
Can pgTap check for a regex instead if just a string?
That's the other option, if the pgTAP author is willing...if the
SQLSTATE thing doesn't work out I guess we'll have
On May 29, 11:35 am, robertmh...@gmail.com (Robert Haas) wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 7:59 AM, Kevin Field kevinjamesfi...@gmail.com
wrote:
On May 28, 5:19 pm, da...@kineticode.com (David E. Wheeler) wrote:
On May 28, 2009, at 12:53 PM, Kevin Field wrote:
Can pgTap check for a regex
On May 29, 11:48 am, Kevin Field kevinjamesfi...@gmail.com wrote:
On May 29, 11:35 am, robertmh...@gmail.com (Robert Haas) wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 7:59 AM, Kevin Field kevinjamesfi...@gmail.com
wrote:
On May 28, 5:19 pm, da...@kineticode.com (David E. Wheeler) wrote:
On May
On May 29, 11:48 am, Kevin Field kevinjamesfi...@gmail.com wrote:
On May 29, 11:35 am, robertmh...@gmail.com (Robert Haas) wrote:
On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 7:59 AM, Kevin Field kevinjamesfi...@gmail.com
wrote:
On May 28, 5:19 pm, da...@kineticode.com (David E. Wheeler) wrote:
On May
I use pgTAP to make sure my functions produce the correct errors using
throws_ok(). So when I get an error from a plpgsql function, it looks
like this:
ERROR: upper bound of FOR loop cannot be null
CONTEXT: PL/pgSQL function foo line 35 at FOR with integer loop
variable
...which I can then
On May 28, 3:22 pm, t...@sss.pgh.pa.us (Tom Lane) wrote:
Kevin Field kevinjamesfi...@gmail.com writes:
I use pgTAP to make sure my functions produce the correct errors using
throws_ok(). So when I get an error from a plpgsql function, it looks
like this:
ERROR: upper bound of FOR loop
On May 28, 3:28 pm, and...@dunslane.net (Andrew Dunstan) wrote:
Kevin Field wrote:
I use pgTAP to make sure my functions produce the correct errors using
throws_ok(). So when I get an error from a plpgsql function, it looks
like this:
ERROR: upper bound of FOR loop cannot be null
On May 13, 5:37 pm, gsm...@gregsmith.com (Greg Smith) wrote:
On Wed, 13 May 2009, Kevin Field wrote:
Or would the only way to do this be to actually create a view and then
call pg_get_viewdef() and then delete the view?
Just make it a temporary view and then it drops when the session ends
On May 14, 2:22 pm, Kevin Field kevinjamesfi...@gmail.com wrote:
Something I ran into though when trying to extend this logic to rules:
for some reason rule definitions are compiled with create rule x as
in front of them, unlike views, which just have everything after the
as. I can keep
On May 14, 2:22 pm, Kevin Field kevinjamesfi...@gmail.com wrote:
Something I ran into though when trying to extend this logic to rules:
for some reason rule definitions are compiled with create rule x as
in front of them, unlike views, which just have everything after the
as. I can keep
On May 13, 11:31 am, Kev kevinjamesfi...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have a script that automatically generates the SQL to create some
views. I'd like it to check whether its generated SQL matches the SQL
returned by select definition from pg_views where I've guessed
most of the rules just
On May 13, 12:41 pm, kevin.gritt...@wicourts.gov (Kevin Grittner)
wrote:
Kevin Field kevinjamesfi...@gmail.com wrote:
One other thing I'm just curious about, != gets replaced with
...how come? (Feels more VB-ish than C-ish, so I was surprised
that that would be the official/preferred
On May 13, 12:52 pm, t...@sss.pgh.pa.us (Tom Lane) wrote:
Kev kevinjamesfi...@gmail.com writes:
... I was surprised
to find that some of my views of the form:
select.from b left join a on a.id=b.id
...were being translated to this:
SELECT..FROM (B LEFT JOIN a ON ((a.id =
On Apr 16, 10:52 am, mito milos.ors...@gmail.com wrote:
By table structure i mean table definition options.
...which includes columns, right?
Sorry, I don't think I can picture what you're trying to do.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to
On Apr 16, 3:14 am, mito milos.ors...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
i have built an SQL interface using rule system which supports row
versioning and i would like to test it against Postgres SQL specification.
Is there something like test cases for postgres SQL interface?
Or do you have any ideas
I'll see if I can get an updated build pushed out sometime today.
I finally got around to trying this out using the March 24th build,
and it has the same issue...
Kev
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
On Apr 8, 10:32 am, dp...@pgadmin.org (Dave Page) wrote:
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 2:48 PM, Kevin Field kevinjamesfi...@gmail.com wrote:
I'll see if I can get an updated build pushed out sometime today.
I finally got around to trying this out using the March 24th build,
and it has the same
On Apr 8, 11:26 am, dp...@pgadmin.org (Dave Page) wrote:
Did you add
shared_preload_libraries = '$libdir/plugins/plugin_debugger.dll'
to postgresql.conf and restart the server per the README?
Oh my goodness. No. Thank you so much. It works fine now. I'll
have to add that to my upgrading
26 matches
Mail list logo
