Manuel Kniep
Danziger Str. 116
10405 Berlin
> Am 20.05.2017 um 10:27 schrieb Cyril Auburtin :
>
> It could be useful to allow the `-` char in allowed LTREE label characters
> (currently a-zA-Z0-9_
> https://https://github.com/adjust/ltreewww.postgresql.org/docs/9.6/st
an enormous performance trade off.
Wouldn’t it make sense to do the insert batch wise e.g. 100 rows ?
Are there any plans doing that or am I miss something?
regards
Manuel Kniep
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http
On 16. Januar 2015 at 00:57:14, Tom Lane (t...@sss.pgh.pa.us) wrote:
> I wrote:
> > Manuel Kniep writes:
> >> ok after lot’s of testing I could create a test case
> >> which can be found here
> >> https://gist.github.com/rapimo/3c8c1b35270e5854c524
> &g
On 6. Januar 2015 at 07:20:21, Michael Paquier (michael.paqu...@gmail.com)
wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 12:39 AM, Manuel Kniep wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > we are running postges 9.3.5 on gentoo linux kernel 3.16.5, compiled with
> > gcc 4.8.3
> > Any ideas ?
t=0xce3a10) at postmaster.c:4011
#49 0x006d8746 in BackendStartup (port=0xce3a10) at postmaster.c:3685
#50 0x006d5240 in ServerLoop () at postmaster.c:1586
#51 0x006d49d7 in PostmasterMain (argc=4, argv=0xcbe800) at
postmaster.c:1253
#52 0x00642930 in main (argc=4, ar
Hi,
I’m missing the PG_RETURN_UINT16 macro in fmgr.h
Since we already have the PG_GETARG_UINT16 macro
I guess it makes sense to to have it.
here is the trivial patch for it.
add_pg_return_uint16_macro.patch
Description: Binary data
cheers
Manuel
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (
