On 2017-02-24 07:25, Robert Haas wrote:
> I don't think it's only Oracle that allows omitting the
> alias; I think there are a number of other systems that behave
> similarly.
SQLite, for example.
Making conversions from SQLite to Postgres easier is a Good Thing.
"subquery in FROM must have an al
On 2014-10-12 13:40, Marko Tiikkaja wrote:
> On 10/12/14, 2:36 PM, Matthew Woodcraft wrote:
>> On 2014-10-10 19:44, Kevin Grittner wrote:
>>> To restate: to do so is conflating the logical definition of the
>>> database with a particular implementation detail. As just o
On 2014-10-10 19:44, Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Peter Geoghegan wrote:
>> People keep remarking that they don't like that you can (optionally)
>> name a unique index explicitly,
[...]
> To restate: to do so is conflating the logical definition of the
> database with a particular implementation de
Peter Geoghegan writes:
> So I took a look at the patch eelog-2012-05-09.diff today. All of the
> following remarks apply to it alone.
I've been trying out this patch for my own interest (I'm very pleased to
see work on this feature), and I have a couple of suggestions from a
user's point of view
On 2011-04-22 21:55, Greg Smith wrote:
> On 04/22/2011 09:32 AM, Simon Riggs wrote:
>> OK, that's good, but ISTM we still have a hole during
>> RemoveOldXlogFiles() where we don't fsync or open/close the file, just
>> rename it.
>
> This is also something that many applications rely upon working a
