Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports

2004-12-10 Thread Patrick B Kelly
of broadcast)--- TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ? http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faqs/FAQ.html Patrick B. Kelly -- v: 484.557.0646 http://patrickbkelly.org

Re: [HACKERS] Bitmap index

2004-11-27 Thread Patrick B Kelly
warehousing. Patrick B. Kelly -- http://patrickbkelly.org ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org

Re: [HACKERS] multiline CSV fields

2004-11-12 Thread Patrick B Kelly
On Nov 12, 2004, at 12:20 AM, Tom Lane wrote: Patrick B Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I may not be explaining myself well or I may fundamentally misunderstand how copy works. Well, you're definitely ignoring the character-set-conversion issue. I was not trying to ignore the character set

Re: [HACKERS] multiline CSV fields

2004-11-11 Thread Patrick B Kelly
. Actually, when I try to export a sheet with multi-line cells from excel, it tells me that this feature is incompatible with the CSV format and will not include them in the CSV file. Patrick B. Kelly -- http

Re: [HACKERS] multiline CSV fields

2004-11-11 Thread Patrick B Kelly
On Nov 11, 2004, at 2:56 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: Tom Lane wrote: Andrew Dunstan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Patrick B Kelly wrote: Actually, when I try to export a sheet with multi-line cells from excel, it tells me that this feature is incompatible with the CSV format and will not include them

Re: [HACKERS] multiline CSV fields

2004-11-11 Thread Patrick B Kelly
On Nov 11, 2004, at 6:16 PM, Tom Lane wrote: Patrick B Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What about just coding a FSM into backend/commands/copy.c:CopyReadLine() that does not process any flavor of NL characters when it is inside of a data field? CopyReadLine has no business tracking that. One

Re: [HACKERS] multiline CSV fields

2004-11-11 Thread Patrick B Kelly
On Nov 11, 2004, at 10:07 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: Patrick B Kelly wrote: My suggestion is to simply have CopyReadLine recognize these two states (in-field and out-of-field) and execute the current logic only while in the second state. It would not be too hard but as you mentioned it is non