At 9:18 PM -0500 3/9/06, Bruce Momjian wrote:
Robert Treat wrote:
On Thursday 09 March 2006 20:16, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I am not sure, but I think that Alvaro's point is the copyright
> > doesn't matter in this instance. It is the license that d
At 12:38 AM -0500 2/20/05, Tom Lane wrote:
Dominic Giampaolo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I believe that what the above comment refers to is the fact that
fsync() is not sufficient to guarantee that your data is on stable
storage and on MacOS X we provide a fcntl(), called F_FULLFSYNC,
to ask th
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 17:59:21 -0800
From: Dominic Giampaolo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: bad fsync? (A.M.)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MySQL makes the following claim at:
http://dev.mysql.com/doc/mysql/en/news-4-1-9.html
"InnoDB: Use the fcntl() file flush method on Mac OS X versions 10.3
and up. A
At 12:31 AM -0500 2/13/03, mlw wrote:
The idea that a, more or less, arbitrary data location determines
the database configuration is wrong. It should be obvious to any
administrator that a configuration file location which controls the
server is the "right" way to do it.
Isn't the database d
At 4:31 PM -0500 11/1/02, Tom Lane wrote:
>Peter Bierman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> At 1:30 AM -0500 11/1/02, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Is it worth carrying two expected files for OS X 10.1 and 10.2? I'm
>>> inclined to think not, and am leaning towards upd
At 1:30 AM -0500 11/1/02, Tom Lane wrote:
>I said:
>> Peter Bierman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> Perhaps the change from gcc2.x to 3.x changed floats a bit?
>
>> Could be. We had previous reports of the same diff on OSX 10.2 with
>> a G4 processor, s
>> *** ./expected/geometry-powerpc-darwin.out Mon Dec 11 08:45:16 2000
>> --- ./results/geometry.out Tue Oct 29 15:40:56 2002
>> ***
>> *** 127,133
>> ! | (-10,0)| [(-100,200),(30,-40)] |
>(-9.99715942258202,15.3864610140472)
>> --- 127,133
>> !
At 6:11 PM -0500 10/29/02, Neil Conway wrote:
>Peter Bierman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> So first off, what's the best way to tell from a cvs snapshot which
>> "release" (if any) that snapshot is?
>
>configure.in, perhaps?
Ah, thanks. 7.3b3 it is then.
So first off, what's the best way to tell from a cvs snapshot which "release" (if any)
that snapshot is?
I just (2pm) grabbed a full clean cvs checkout, and tried to run the regression tests.
This is on a Macintosh G4/450 dual CPU with 512MB.
'make runcheck' in src/test/regress/ fails with:
th active on the darwin-development mailing list.
(http://lists.apple.com/mailman/listinfo/darwin-development)
-pmb
At 1:52 PM -0700 5/1/02, Jim Magee wrote:
>On Wednesday, May 1, 2002, at 01:34 PM, Peter Bierman wrote:
>
>> Is fork() disallowed after shutdown starts?
>
>N
At 12:08 PM -0800 4/5/02, Dann Corbit wrote:
>I guess that this model can be viewed as "everything is a snapshot".
>It seems plain that the repercussions for a data warehouse and for
>reporting have not been thought out very well. This is definitely
>very, very bad in that arena. I suppose that
At 10:47 PM +0200 9/19/01, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>Peter Bierman writes:
>
>> While checking out TOT pgsql today onto an HFS+ file system (case-preserving,
>case-insensitive), I hit the following CVS conflict:
>>
>> pgsql/src/backend/utils/mb/Unicode/utf8_to_alt.map
While checking out TOT pgsql today onto an HFS+ file system (case-preserving,
case-insensitive), I hit the following CVS conflict:
pgsql/src/backend/utils/mb/Unicode/utf8_to_alt.map
pgsql/src/backend/utils/mb/Unicode/utf8_to_ALT.map
HFS+ can not store two differerent files in a path that diffe
At 5:47 PM -0500 4/4/01, Neil Tiffin wrote:
>Using current cvs version on Mac OS X 10.0
>
>test horology ... FAILED
I can't reproduce this on a 10.0 (4K78) system. I just ran the regression tests from
cvs HEAD downloaded @ 16:10 PDT on a G3/350. It also passed several dozen iteratio
At 7:53 PM -0500 3/26/01, Tom Lane wrote:
>Thomas Lockhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>> "PPC750"? What's that? "PPC G3" might be more likely to mean something
>>> to onlookers ...
>
>> Actually "G3" means nothing outside of Apple afaict. The 750 series is a
>> follow-on to the 60x series, and
At 7:15 PM -0500 12/29/00, Tom Lane wrote:
>Alfred Perlstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Rasmus Lerdorf warned one of you guys that simply linking to GNU
>> readline can contaminate code with the GPL.
>
>> Readline isn't LGPL which permits linking without lincense issues,
>> it is GPL which mea
At 9:43 PM -0400 12/17/00, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
>On Sat, 16 Dec 2000, Peter Bierman wrote:
>
>> (BTW- tons of stuff at www.postgresql.org is busted. Searching mailing
>> list archives for example.)
>
>Please provide URLs where you are trying to search ... we did exten
At 3:16 PM -0500 12/16/00, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>Here is the list of features in 7.1.
>New Darwin/Mac OSX port (Bruce Hartzler)
Not to be a snob, but I probably did 80% of this.
(BTW- tons of stuff at www.postgresql.org is busted. Searching mailing list archives
for example.)
-pmb
--
"Every t
At 5:17 PM -0500 12/3/00, mlw wrote:
>I honestly feel that it is wrong to take what others have shared and use
>it for the basis of something you will not share, and I can't understand
>how anyone could think differently.
Yeah, it really sucks when companies that are in buisness to make money by
>And I really havn't seen much in the way of full featured products, complete
>with printed docs, 24 hour support, tutorials, wizards, templates, a company
>to sue if the code causes damage, GUI install, setup, removal, etc. etc. etc.
Mac OS X.
;-)
-pmb
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"4 out of 5 people
20 matches
Mail list logo
