On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 10:49 PM, David Fetter wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 10:06:32AM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Heikki Linnakangas writes:
> > > I'd like to include pg_rewind in contrib.
> >
> > I don't object to adding the tool as such, but let's wait to see
> > what happens with Peter's
> I am sending updated patch - buggy statement is printed via more logical
psql_error function instead printf
Thank you for updating patch, I really appreciate your efforts.
Now, everything is good from my side.
* it apply cleanly to the current git master
* includes necessary docs
* I think It i
Hi Pavel,
After applying patch, on error condition it displays error message two
times as follows:
ERROR: column "abc" does not exist at character 23
STATEMENT: insert into ax
values(abc);
psql:a.sql:7: ERROR: column "abc" does not exist
LINE 2: values(abc);
user may confuse because of repea
of the project is https://github.com/vmware/pg_rewind.
>
>
Sure, I will add those issues on github.
> Either way, here are some comments below...
>
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Samrat Revagade
> wrote:
> > While testing pg_rewind I encountered following probl
While testing pg_rewind I encountered following problem.
I used following process to do the testing, Please correct me if I am doing
it in wrong way.
Problem-1:
pg_rewind gives error (target master must be shut down cleanly.) when
master crashed unexpectedly.
1. Setup Streaming Replication (stan
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 7:54 PM, Dean Rasheed wrote:
> On 20 September 2013 11:29, Samrat Revagade
> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> > Okay, are you adding this to the september commitfest?
> >> >
> >>
> >> OK, I've done that. I th
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 3:16 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2013-10-08 15:07:02 +0530, Pavan Deolasee wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 2:33 PM, Sawada Masahiko >wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 4:32 PM, Fujii Masao
> wrote:
> > > >
> > > I attached the v12 patch which have modified based o
> The idea is to allow configuration of standby servers such that they have
>> there own set of replication parameters as per requirements.
>>
>
> How does this interplay with the synchronous_standby_names parameter ? Or
> do you think that becomes irrelevant if we do like what you are suggesting
file.
But after all of this, I think it will be a good change and will provide
more granularity to the replication.
Greetings,
Samrat Revagade,
NTT DATA OSS Center Pune, India.
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Sameer Thakur wrote:
>
>
>
>
>>>
>> >Attached patch combines documentation patch and source-code patch.
>>
>
> I have had a stab at reviewing the documentation. Have a look.
>
>
Thanks.
Attached patch implements suggestions in documentation.
But comments from Fujii
eign tab do not complete on Cent-OS
6.3 (tab complete for local tables but not for foreign tables)
Is that a problem ?
Regards,
Samrat Revagade
> > syncrep.c: In function ‘SyncRepReleaseWaiters’:
> > syncrep.c:421:6: warning: variable ‘numdataflush’ set but not used
> > [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
> >
>
> Sorry I forgot fix it.
>
> I have attached the patch which I modified.
>
>
Attached patch combines documentation patch and source-code p
>> *for example: for failback safe standby.*
>I think that introducing another configuration format is a pretty bad
>idea. While something new might not turn out to be as bad, we've seen
>how annoying a separate configuration format turned out for
>recovery.conf.
Its not totally different way of
Please find updated hyperlinks:
> Below I have explained how to to use ini file for failback safe stadby setup:
> While discussing feature of fail-back safe standby
> (CAF8Q-Gy7xa60HwXc0MKajjkWFEbFDWTG=ggyu1kmt+s2xcq...@mail.gmail.com)
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAF8Q-Gy7xa60HwXc0MKajjk
Hi,
I was going through the archives and there was a discussion about
using ini file to setup
replication.(http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/4c9876b4.9020...@enterprisedb.com).
I think if we work on this proposal and separate out the replication
setup from postgresql.conf file then we can prov
> ToDo
> 1. currently this patch supports synchronous transfer. so we can't set
> different synchronous transfer mode to each server.
> we need to improve the patch for support following cases.
>- SYNC standby and make separate ASYNC failback safe standby
>- ASYNC standby and make separ
Hi Fabien,
While applying latest version of the patch (regress-big-v4.patch) on
latest PostgreSQL version i encountered following errors:
a) Using git:
$git apply --index regress-big-v4.patch
regress-big-v4.patch:10: trailing whitespace.
$(srcdir)/parallel_schedule $(srcdir)/parallel_big_sche
Hi Fabien,
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 10:42 AM, Fabien COELHO wrote:
>
> - I do not understand why the makefile specifies $(srcdir) before
>>>local files in some places.
>>>
>>
>> For VPATH builds :-)
>>
>
> Here is a v2 which is more likely to work under VPATH.
I really appreciate your effo
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 11:08 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On 16 June 2013 17:25, Samrat Revagade wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Simon Riggs
> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> So I strongly object to calling this patch any
On Sun, Jun 16, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Simon Riggs wrote:
>
>
> So I strongly object to calling this patch anything to do with
> "failback safe". You simply don't have enough data to make such a bold
> claim. (Which is why we call it synchronous replication and not "zero
> data loss", for example).
>
>
That will not happen if there is inconsistency in between both the servers.
Please refer to the discussions on the link provided in the first post:
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/caf8q-gxg3pqtf71nvece-6ozraew5pwhk7yqtbjgwrfu513...@mail.gmail.com
Regards,
Samrat Revgade
>(5) *The master then forces a write of the data page related to this
transaction.*
*Sorry, this is incorrect. Whenever the master writes the data page it
checks that the WAL record is written in standby till that LSN. *
*
*
>While master is waiting to force a write (point 5) for this data page,
>>it's one of the reasons why a fresh base backup is required when starting
old master as new standby? >>If yes, I agree with you. I've often heard the
complaints about a backup when restarting new standby. >>That's really big
problem.
I think Fujii Masao is on the same page.
>In case of syncre
em.
Regards,
Samrat
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 10:40 PM, Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 7:34 PM, Samrat Revagade
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > We have been trying to figure out possible solutions to the following
> problem in streaming replic
Hello,
We have been trying to figure out possible solutions to the following
problem in streaming replication Consider following scenario:
If master receives commit command, it writes and flushes commit WAL records
to the disk, It also writes and flushes data page related to this
transaction.
Th
25 matches
Mail list logo
