Re: [HACKERS] Upgrading rant.

2003-01-06 Thread Thomas O'Connell
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bruce Momjian) wrote: Is pg_upgrade too hard to run? Is no one really interested in it? As an end-user, I'm very interested in pg_upgrade, but I think it's kind of a chicken and egg problem. Without much of a guarantee that it's fail-safe,

Re: [HACKERS] Upgrading rant.

2003-01-06 Thread Thomas O'Connell
Exactly. I've got something that works and is, in fact, the recommended method for upgrading, currently. For me to switch, I'd need something in which the developers were confident enough to recommend. And even to test, I'd need something more than what is available right now. -tfo In

Re: [HACKERS] Big 7.4 items

2002-12-17 Thread Thomas O'Connell
So if this gets added to the 7.3 branch, will there be documentation accompanying it? -tfo In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bruce Momjian) wrote: OK, I just talked to Patrick on the phone, and he says Neil Conway is working on merging the code into 7.3, and adding missing

Re: [HACKERS] [GENERAL] PostgreSQL Global Development Group Announces

2002-12-06 Thread Thomas O'Connell
As someone who exists mainly as an active user (and part-time advocate/documentation tweaker), I have found the release of PostgreSQL 7.3 to be disappointing. The ensuing pseudo-flamewar on the various lists has been similarly disappointing. I was surprised, for instance, to receive a non-list

Re: [HACKERS] Anyone want to assist with the translation of the Advocacy site?

2002-10-03 Thread Thomas O'Connell
Is anyone interested in translating the English version to other languages? I don't have time for the translation, unfortunately, but i would suggest changing worlds to world's on the main page. -tfo ---(end of broadcast)--- TIP 1: subscribe