Re: [HACKERS] Time to update list of contributors

2007-11-28 Thread Usama Munir
IMHO, it may not be a bad idea to list countries , it shows the diversity of the community. -Original Message- From: Gregory Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [HACKERS] String encoding during connection handshake

2007-11-27 Thread Usama Munir
Martin is actually right. No assumption is made about the encoding of the password. The password is recieved as a set of bytes over the wire-level protocol and then processed accordingly as per your pg_hba settings. please refer to auth.c method recv_password_packet(Port *port). The comment on

[HACKERS] pg_get_tabledef

2007-05-21 Thread Usama Munir
like someone to develop a patch in isolation and just come up with it one day, but it really came out as a by-product of some other work , and i thought you guys might be interested in it. if it is desired, i will submit a patch for it, within a day or so. Regards, Usama Munir EnterpriseDB

Re: [HACKERS] pg_get_tabledef

2007-05-21 Thread Usama Munir
that wrap and use pg_dump with a few options? Surely that's a more appropriate way to achieve this functionality? - Naz. Usama Munir wrote: Hi, i was following a thread some time ago where adding a function *pg_get_tabledef* was one of the TODOs for 8.2, but it somehow didn't make

Re: [HACKERS] pg_get_tabledef

2007-05-21 Thread Usama Munir
to be able to backup their stuff. Is my understanding somewhere near actual idea or i am way off here? Are there any discussions on this topic which could give me a little more idea? because i would definitely like to take a shot at this. Regards, Usama Munir EnterpriseDB (www.enterprisedb.com

Re: [HACKERS] pg_get_tabledef

2007-05-21 Thread Usama Munir
it and get back to you guys. Thanks for your feedback. Regards, Usama Munir. Andrew Dunstan wrote: I mean as a shared library - a .so for Unix (or whatever the flavor of unix uses instead) or a DLL on WIndows. And no, it would not be in contrib - as I mentioned in another thread yesterday I