On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 2:58 PM, Venkata Balaji N wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 1:02 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Rahila Syed
>> wrote:
>> > Thank you for inputs everyone.
>> >
>> > The opinions on this thread
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 1:02 AM, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Rahila Syed
> wrote:
> > Thank you for inputs everyone.
> >
> > The opinions on this thread can be classified into following
> > 1. Commit
> > 2. Rollback
> > 3. Error
> > 4. Warning
> >
> > As per opinion upth
e 1.*
*No rewind required.*
I am not getting this too.
Regards,
Venkata Balaji N
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 1:28 AM, David Steele wrote:
> On 3/24/15 6:12 AM, Venkata Balaji N wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 9:54 AM, David Steele > <mailto:da...@pgmasters.net>> wrote:
> >
> > On 3/23/15 12:42 AM, Venkata Balaji N wrote:
>
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 9:54 AM, David Steele wrote:
> On 3/23/15 12:42 AM, Venkata Balaji N wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Assuming that this might require a patch, i am posting this in
> > pgsql-hackers. Apologies, if this is not the appropriate mailing list to
> >
ve='true'
If this requires a patch, i would like to take it up.
Regards,
Venkata Balaji N
well how to use this. The code should work too, and comments on that
> are welcome too, but I haven't tested it much. I'll do more testing next
> week.
Patch did get applied successfully to the latest master. Can you please
rebase.
Regards,
Venkata Balaji N
ansaction log file(s) added, 0 removed, 170 recycled;
write=149.432 s, sync=0.664 s, total=150.284 s; sync files=13,
longest=0.286 s, average=0.051 s; distance=1244483 kB, estimate=2632860 kB
Above checkpoint logs are generated at the time when pg_xlog size was at
5.4G
*Code* *Review*
I had a look at the code and do not have any comments from my end.
Regards,
Venkata Balaji N
>
> I am wondering a bit about interaction with wal_keep_segments.
> One thing is that wal_keep_segments is still specified in number of
> segments and not size units, maybe it would be worth to change it also?
> And the other thing is that, if set, the wal_keep_segments is the real
> max_wal_size
Missed adding "pgsql-hackers" group while replying.
Regards,
Venkata Balaji N
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Venkata Balaji N wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 7:58 PM, Heikki Linnakangas <
> hlinnakan...@vmware.com> wrote:
>
>> On 01/30/2015 04:48
Hi,
I really like the idea of tuning checkpoint segments based on disk space
usage.
I performed series of tests for this patch and would like to share the
results. My comments are in-line.
To start with, I applied this patch to the master successfully -
> But ... do I understand things correc
11 matches
Mail list logo
