OK, I see. Thanks for mentioning it.
Are there other problems with the suggestion? Or should the work like that?
Viktor
2010/11/10 Robert Haas
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2010 at 6:32 AM, Viktor Valy wrote:
> > Thanks for your answer!
> > I'm not really familiar with inheritance, b
test-cases you have posted? Or is this yet a
problem?
Viktor
2010/11/9 Robert Haas
> On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 10:50 AM, Viktor Valy wrote:
> > Hi Everybody!
> > I looked up this todo, and figured out a plan, how the implementation
> could
> > be written.
> > The ma
Hi Everybody!
I looked up this todo, and figured out a plan, how the implementation could
be written.
The main challenge is to keep constraints and indexes (for unique and PK
constraints) consistent.
Fortunately this is already realized in the case of an index. So at ALTER
INDEX RENAME the consist
Bruce Momjian
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Viktor Valy writes:
> > > We are 2 Students from the Technical University of Vienna. At our
> internship
> > > we would like to develop the item of the TODO list: "Allow SET
> CONSTRAINTS
> > > to be qualified by
Thanks for the advice!
Yes, we are new to linux too :)
We have chosen Eclipse, because we have already experience with it.
However, after downloading the code from CVS, we can't build it, because of
some include commands in *tutorial / complex.c *says "*No such file or
directory*". Does anybody k
Hello!
We are 2 Students from the Technical University of Vienna. At our internship
we would like to develop the item of the TODO list: "Allow SET CONSTRAINTS
to be qualified by schema/table name".
Is anyone working on it?
Our research at the SET CONTRAINTS function showed the following Error:
*E
