Hello,
>> I agree with first version, and attached the updated patch which are
>> modified so that it supports simple multiple sync replication you
>>suggested.
>> (but test cases are not included yet.)
I have tried for some basic in-built test cases for multisync rep.
I have created one patch over Michael's http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CAB7nPqTEqou=xryrgsga13qw1xxssd6tfhz-sm_j3egdvso...@mail.gmail.com";>patch
patch.
Still it is in progress.
Please have look and correct me if i am wrong and suggest remaining test cases.
Regards
Suraj Kharage
If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion below:
http://postgresql.nabble.com/Support-for-N-synchronous-standby-servers-take-2-tp5849384p5886259.html
This email was sent by
kharagesuraj<http://postgresql.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=user_nodes&user=346648>
(via Nabble)
To receive all replies by email, subscribe to this
discussion<http://postgresql.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=subscribe_by_code&node=5849384&code=c3VyYWoua2hhcmFnZUBudHRkYXRhLmNvbXw1ODQ5Mzg0fC0xOTM1NzcyNDkx>
__
Disclaimer: This email and any attachments are sent in strictest confidence
for the sole use of the addressee and may contain legally privileged,
confidential, and proprietary data. If you are not the intended recipient,
please advise the sender by replying promptly to this email and then delete
and destroy this email and any attachments without any further use, copying
or forwarding.
recovery_test_suite_with_multisync.patch (36K)
<http://postgresql.nabble.com/attachment/5886503/0/recovery_test_suite_with_multisync.patch>
--
View this message in context:
http://postgresql.nabble.com/Support-for-N-synchronous-standby-servers-take-2-tp5849384p5886503.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
