Is this patch available in version 9.2.1 ?
Senthil
--
View this message in context:
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Switching-timeline-over-streaming-replication-tp5723547p5734744.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers
We are using 9.1.,
We have a set up like a master and 2 standby servers. M -- S1,S2 . Both
standby S1 and S2 share the same archive. Master will have an Virtual IP.
Both stand by servers will be replicated using this virtual ip.
Assume the master fails,using our heart beat mechanism Virtual IP
Whether this feature is available in version 9.1.0. ??
--
View this message in context:
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Tracking-latest-timeline-in-standby-mode-tp3238829p4863900.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers
Thanks for your reply.,
@ Robert.,
What issue we may face if you take a backups(includes data dir + wal files)
at standby without LVM snapshot?
-Senthil
--
View this message in context:
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Backup-s-from-standby-tp4688344p4706899.html
Sent from the
Thanks for your reply.
What will happen if you issue *checkpoint* at STANDBY. I presume that it
will flush the data to the disk.
Will there be any conflict with the master WAL.(like checkpoint location...)
Senthil
--
View this message in context:
What is the basic reason for restricting backup at standby
server(pg_start_backup)?
We are doing the following steps to take backup from standby which(backups)
might be used for standalone startups.
1.Create file system snapshot(LVM)
2.take the back up of data directory including wal files
