Given that this seems to have slipped off the hackers radar (or in too hard
basket) I have constructed a horrible solution.
I will stop using autovacuum for this relation , I will use our own system
to monitor the relation, and I will reset pgclass.reltuples on this relation
after vacuum is done to the correct value.
I note that vacuum.c has comments in vac_update_relstat that changes to
pg_class are done without a transaction. Are there dangers of my doing an
update pg_class set reltuples=6 where relkind='r' and
relname='my_hot_table' ?
--
View this message in context:
http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Inaccuracy-in-VACUUM-s-tuple-count-estimates-tp5806367p5809273.html
Sent from the PostgreSQL - hackers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers