[HACKERS] lru cache replacement

I was researching on cache replacement strategy as well. 2Q has one disadvantage see this exellent paper: http://www.almaden.ibm.com/cs/people/dmodha/#ARC see the paper "ARC: A Self-Tuning, Low Overhead Replacement Cache" for theory and "One Up on LRU" for implementation details. ARC requires no tu

Re: [HACKERS] lru cache replacement

On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, Tom Lane wrote: > Yutaka tanida <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> does pgbench test with relatively large sequential scans? > > > Probably no. > > pgbench tries to avoid any seqscans at all, I believe, so it wouldn't be > very useful for testing

Re: [HACKERS] lru cache replacement

On Tue, 24 Jun 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I was researching on cache replacement strategy as well. 2Q has one > disadvantage see this exellent paper: > http://www.almaden.ibm.com/cs/people/dmodha/#ARC see the paper > "ARC: A Self-Tuning, Low Overhead Replacement Cache" for theory and "One > U