On 08/15/2014 04:58 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote:
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 10:40:59PM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
Heh. I'm not particularly averse to changing this, but I guess I
don't see any particular benefit of changing it either. Either comma
or comma-space is a legal separator, so why worry
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 12:20 AM, Christoph Martin
christoph.r.mar...@gmail.com wrote:
True. Both variants are legal, and most people won't ever notice. I stumbled
across this while writing a test case for a transaction helper that
sets/restores search_path before committing. The test was to
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 10:40:59PM +0900, Fujii Masao wrote:
Heh. I'm not particularly averse to changing this, but I guess I
don't see any particular benefit of changing it either. Either comma
or comma-space is a legal separator, so why worry about it?
This change might cause me to
On Fri, Jul 11, 2014 at 6:09 AM, Christoph Martin
christoph.r.mar...@gmail.com wrote:
I noticed a minor inconsistency with the search_path separator used in the
default configuration.
The schemas of any search_path set using `SET search_path TO...` are
separated by , (comma, space), while
True. Both variants are legal, and most people won't ever notice. I
stumbled across this while writing a test case for a transaction helper
that sets/restores search_path before committing. The test was to simply
compare the string values of `SHOW search_path;` before `BEGIN
TRANSACTION;` and
Hi
I noticed a minor inconsistency with the search_path separator used in the
default configuration.
The schemas of any search_path set using `SET search_path TO...` are
separated by , (comma, space), while the default value is only separated
by , (comma).
The attached patch against master
