On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 6:22 PM, Florian Pflug wrote:
> On Nov9, 2011, at 23:53 , Daniel Farina wrote:
> > I think a novice user would be scared half to death: I know I was the
> > first time. That's not a great impression for the project to leave
> > for what is not, at its root, a vast defect,
2011-11-10 03:35 keltezéssel, Joshua D. Drake írta:
>
> On 11/09/2011 06:15 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>>
>> 2011/11/9 Devrim GÜNDÜZ:
>>> On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 21:12 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
The point is that all the packaging will be done *before* people leave
to go eat Turkey.
>>>
>>> Eati
Robert Haas writes:
> On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 9:03 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
>> Given that we start packaging on Thursday, that would mean waiting an
>> additional 2 weeks.
> Yeah, I don't see what's wrong with the 21st.
One advantage of waiting two more weeks is that we could declare it to
be the
On 11/09/2011 06:15 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
2011/11/9 Devrim GÜNDÜZ:
On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 21:12 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
The point is that all the packaging will be done *before* people leave
to go eat Turkey.
Eating me?
:-)
No, just your country.
I hear it is a little dry.
--
Comma
2011/11/9 Devrim GÜNDÜZ :
> On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 21:12 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
>> The point is that all the packaging will be done *before* people leave
>> to go eat Turkey.
>
> Eating me?
:-)
No, just your country.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise Post
On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 21:12 -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> The point is that all the packaging will be done *before* people leave
> to go eat Turkey.
Eating me?
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
Principal Systems Engineer @ EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certifie
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 9:03 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
>> Ehhh That week is kind of moot for most of the United States.
>> Shouldn't it be like Tuesday the week after?
>
> Given that we start packaging on Thursday, that would mean waiting an
> additional 2 weeks.
Yeah, I don't see what's wrong wi
> Ehhh That week is kind of moot for most of the United States.
> Shouldn't it be like Tuesday the week after?
Given that we start packaging on Thursday, that would mean waiting an
additional 2 weeks.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers ma
On 11/09/2011 03:56 PM, Josh Berkus wrote:
So that's my take on it. It's not a "tomorrow" severity release
(we've been living with the workaround for months, even though it is
blocking some things), but I would really appreciate an expedited
release to enable unattended hot-standby operation
On Nov9, 2011, at 23:53 , Daniel Farina wrote:
> I think a novice user would be scared half to death: I know I was the
> first time. That's not a great impression for the project to leave
> for what is not, at its root, a vast defect, and the fact it's
> occurring for people when they use rsync ra
> So that's my take on it. It's not a "tomorrow" severity release
> (we've been living with the workaround for months, even though it is
> blocking some things), but I would really appreciate an expedited
> release to enable unattended hot-standby operation and to avoid
> scaring those who encoun
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 2:24 PM, Greg Smith wrote:
> I think Daniel has run into this problem more than anyone else, so hearing
> it's fixed for him makes me feel a lot better that it's been resolved. I'd
> characterize this problem as a medium grade data corruption issue. It's not
> security iss
On 11/09/2011 03:58 PM, Daniel Farina wrote:
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 9:06 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
I definitely think they are important enough to trigger a release. But as
you say, I think we need confirmation that they actually fix the problem...
I have confirmed that the clog/sub
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 9:06 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> I definitely think they are important enough to trigger a release. But as
> you say, I think we need confirmation that they actually fix the problem...
I have confirmed that the clog/subtrans fixes allow us to start up
while in hot standby
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 12:58 PM, Daniel Farina wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 9:06 PM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> I definitely think they are important enough to trigger a release. But as
>> you say, I think we need confirmation that they actually fix the problem...
>
> I have confirmed that the
On 11/09/2011 01:12 PM, Greg Jaskiewicz wrote:
Would you consider it a blocker for a rollout on production system ?
I wouldn't. Good process for checking your backups should find this
problem if it pops up, and it's not that easy to run into. That's why I
was saying there are workarounds he
> I definitely think they are important enough to trigger a release. But as
> you say, I think we need confirmation that they actually fix the problem...
Just last night Heroku was offering to help us test replication stuff.
I'll take them up on it.
Link for the patch and issue in question?
--
On 9 Nov 2011, at 05:06, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> I definitely think they are important enough to trigger a release. But as you
> say, I think we need confirmation that they actually fix the problem...
>
Would you consider it a blocker for a rollout on production system ?
On Nov 9, 2011 3:25 AM, "Tom Lane" wrote:
>
> Greg Smith writes:
> > I was curious how 9.0 fared last year for comparison, here's that data:
>
> > Version Date Days Weeks
> > 9.0.009/20/10
> > 9.0.110/04/10142.0
> > 9.0.212/16/107310.4
> > 9.0.301/31/1146
Greg Smith writes:
> I was curious how 9.0 fared last year for comparison, here's that data:
> Version Date Days Weeks
> 9.0.009/20/10
> 9.0.110/04/10142.0
> 9.0.212/16/107310.4
> 9.0.301/31/11466.6
> 9.0.404/18/117711.0
> 9.0.509/26/1
On 11/08/2011 07:34 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
I don't recall that we've fixed anything since September that seemed to
warrant an immediate release.
The backup+pg_clog failure issues fixed last week have been a nasty
problem hitting people for a while. Backup corruption is obviously
serious. O
Greg Jaskiewicz writes:
> Given the amount of fixes that went into the branch, and importance of them -
> when can we expect 9.1.2 to be released officially ?
> 9.1.1 was stamped on 22nd of September.
That's barely more than six weeks ago. Usually, in the absence of any
seriously nasty bugs, P
Given the amount of fixes that went into the branch, and importance of them -
when can we expect 9.1.2 to be released officially ?
9.1.1 was stamped on 22nd of September.
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.post
23 matches
Mail list logo
