Re: [HACKERS] 9.2 commitfest closure (was Command Triggers, v16)

2012-03-28 Thread Robert Haas
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 7:39 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: Fine. What do you propose, specifically? The end of the month is coming up.  How about we propose to close the 'fest on April 1st?  Anything that's not

Re: [HACKERS] 9.2 commitfest closure (was Command Triggers, v16)

2012-03-28 Thread Simon Riggs
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 7:39 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: Fine. What do you propose, specifically? The end of the month is coming up.  

Re: [HACKERS] 9.2 commitfest closure (was Command Triggers, v16)

2012-03-28 Thread Tom Lane
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes: On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote: Let's split the difference: how about we close it a week from this Friday. That would be April 6, 2012, ten days from today. Anybody, anybody? Can we try to get some agreement

Re: [HACKERS] 9.2 commitfest closure (was Command Triggers, v16)

2012-03-28 Thread Noah Misch
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 09:45:29AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote: On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 1:36 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote: Let's split the difference: how about we close it a week from this Friday. ?That would be April 6, 2012, ten days from today. Anybody, anybody? Can we try

Re: [HACKERS] 9.2 commitfest closure (was Command Triggers, v16)

2012-03-27 Thread Simon Riggs
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 12:39 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: Thom Brown t...@linux.com writes: This is probably a dumb question but... surely there's more than 2 committers able to review? Able and willing might be two different things.  Alvaro, Heikki, and Magnus have all been

Re: [HACKERS] 9.2 commitfest closure (was Command Triggers, v16)

2012-03-27 Thread Robert Haas
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 7:39 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: Fine. What do you propose, specifically? The end of the month is coming up.  How about we propose to close the 'fest on April 1st?  Anything that's not committable by then goes to the 9.3 list.  If one week seems too short,

[HACKERS] 9.2 commitfest closure (was Command Triggers, v16)

2012-03-26 Thread Thom Brown
On 26 March 2012 23:16, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote: On Mar 26, 2012, at 5:36 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: Well, I think I'm definitely on the hook for the pg_stat_statements, pgsql_fdw, foreign table stats, and caching-stable-subexpressions patches, and I should look at

Re: [HACKERS] 9.2 commitfest closure (was Command Triggers, v16)

2012-03-26 Thread Tom Lane
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes: On Mar 26, 2012, at 5:36 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes: 2. I'm not sure which patches Tom is planning to look at or in what order, so I've been avoiding the ones he seems to be taking an interest in.

Re: [HACKERS] 9.2 commitfest closure (was Command Triggers, v16)

2012-03-26 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 01:39, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote: Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes: Thom Brown t...@linux.com writes: This is probably a dumb question but... surely there's more than 2 committers able to review? Able and willing might be two different things.  Alvaro,