Re: [HACKERS] Add doc advice about systemd RemoveIPC

2017-02-15 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 2/14/17 11:49 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > + > +If systemd is in use, some care must be > taken > +that IPC resources (shared memory and semaphores) are not prematurely > +removed by the operating system. This is especially of concern when > +installing PostgreSQL from

Re: [HACKERS] Add doc advice about systemd RemoveIPC

2017-02-14 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Fri, Feb 10, 2017 at 10:36 PM, Peter Eisentraut < peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 12/31/16 11:43 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > > Magnus Hagander writes: > >> I still think that some wording in the direction of the fact that the > >> majority of all users won't

Re: [HACKERS] Add doc advice about systemd RemoveIPC

2017-02-10 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 12/31/16 11:43 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Magnus Hagander writes: >> I still think that some wording in the direction of the fact that the >> majority of all users won't actually have this problem is the right thing >> to do (regardless of our previous history in the area as

Re: [HACKERS] Add doc advice about systemd RemoveIPC

2016-12-31 Thread Tom Lane
Magnus Hagander writes: > I still think that some wording in the direction of the fact that the > majority of all users won't actually have this problem is the right thing > to do (regardless of our previous history in the area as pointed out by > Craig) +1. The

Re: [HACKERS] Add doc advice about systemd RemoveIPC

2016-12-31 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 6:30 AM, Peter Eisentraut < peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 12/30/16 3:59 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > > I wonder if I missed part of the discussions around this, so maybe my > > understanding of the cases where this occurs is wrong, but isn't it the > > case

Re: [HACKERS] Add doc advice about systemd RemoveIPC

2016-12-30 Thread Peter Eisentraut
On 12/30/16 3:59 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote: > I wonder if I missed part of the discussions around this, so maybe my > understanding of the cases where this occurs is wrong, but isn't it the > case of pretty much all (or actually) all the packaged versions of > postgresql out there (debian, redhat

Re: [HACKERS] Add doc advice about systemd RemoveIPC

2016-12-30 Thread Craig Ringer
On 30 December 2016 at 16:59, Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 4:34 AM, Peter Eisentraut > wrote: >> >> Here is a patch to add some information about the systemd RemoveIPC >> issue to the documentation, sort of in the spirit

Re: [HACKERS] Add doc advice about systemd RemoveIPC

2016-12-30 Thread Magnus Hagander
On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 4:34 AM, Peter Eisentraut < peter.eisentr...@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > Here is a patch to add some information about the systemd RemoveIPC > issue to the documentation, sort of in the spirit of the OOM discussion > nearby. > I wonder if I missed part of the discussions

[HACKERS] Add doc advice about systemd RemoveIPC

2016-12-27 Thread Peter Eisentraut
Here is a patch to add some information about the systemd RemoveIPC issue to the documentation, sort of in the spirit of the OOM discussion nearby. -- Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services >From