Re: [HACKERS] Difference when using ZIC vs. Timezone Abbr - Bug? - SOLVED

2008-08-22 Thread Dave Witt
Ah.. my definition of MDT was flawed; thanks for the help! Alvaro Herrera wrote: Tom Lane wrote: Dave Witt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: These two queries produce different output, using version 8.3.3: SELECT '2008-01-01 00:00:00+00'::timestamptz AT TIME ZONE 'MDT'; SELECT '2008-01-01

[HACKERS] Difference when using ZIC vs. Timezone Abbr - Bug?

2008-08-21 Thread Dave Witt
These two queries produce different output, using version 8.3.3: SELECT '2008-01-01 00:00:00+00'::timestamptz AT TIME ZONE 'MDT'; SELECT '2008-01-01 00:00:00+00'::timestamptz AT TIME ZONE 'America/Boise'; ..is this a bug? Note: America/Boise=MDT (from pg_timezone_names) Best regards, --

Re: [HACKERS] Difference when using ZIC vs. Timezone Abbr - Bug?

2008-08-21 Thread Tom Lane
Dave Witt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: These two queries produce different output, using version 8.3.3: SELECT '2008-01-01 00:00:00+00'::timestamptz AT TIME ZONE 'MDT'; SELECT '2008-01-01 00:00:00+00'::timestamptz AT TIME ZONE 'America/Boise'; Why are you surprised? Boise would've been on MST

Re: [HACKERS] Difference when using ZIC vs. Timezone Abbr - Bug?

2008-08-21 Thread Alvaro Herrera
Tom Lane wrote: Dave Witt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: These two queries produce different output, using version 8.3.3: SELECT '2008-01-01 00:00:00+00'::timestamptz AT TIME ZONE 'MDT'; SELECT '2008-01-01 00:00:00+00'::timestamptz AT TIME ZONE 'America/Boise'; Why are you surprised? Boise