Re: [HACKERS] Documentation tweak for row-valued expressions and null

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 11:10 AM, Jim Nasby wrote: > On 7/26/15 8:40 PM, Thomas Munro wrote: >> >> I wonder if it might be worth adding a tiny note to the manual to >> point out that the special logic for " IS [ NOT >> ] NULL" doesn't apply anywhere else that we handle

Re: [HACKERS] Documentation tweak for row-valued expressions and null

On 7/26/15 8:40 PM, Thomas Munro wrote: I wonder if it might be worth adding a tiny note to the manual to point out that the special logic for " IS [ NOT ] NULL" doesn't apply anywhere else that we handle nulls or talk about [non]-null values in the manual. See attached. Yes. This is a common

[HACKERS] Documentation tweak for row-valued expressions and null

Hi I wonder if it might be worth adding a tiny note to the manual to point out that the special logic for row-valued-expression IS [ NOT ] NULL doesn't apply anywhere else that we handle nulls or talk about [non]-null values in the manual. See attached. -- Thomas Munro