Hi,
Testing the CHECK NOT VALID patch i found $subject... is this intended?
--
Jaime Casanova www.2ndQuadrant.com
Professional PostgreSQL: Soporte 24x7 y capacitación
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
On 15 June 2011 07:56, Jaime Casanova ja...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Hi,
Testing the CHECK NOT VALID patch i found $subject... is this intended?
I just noticed that too, and was about to raise it as a bug.
If it is intended, then it's not documented.
I noticed it while browsing gram.y, and
Dean Rasheed dean.a.rash...@gmail.com writes:
On 15 June 2011 07:56, Jaime Casanova ja...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Testing the CHECK NOT VALID patch i found $subject... is this intended?
Aside from the ugliness of the code, we can't just add a
ConstraintAttributeSpec to the second block,
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Dean Rasheed dean.a.rash...@gmail.com writes:
On 15 June 2011 07:56, Jaime Casanova ja...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Testing the CHECK NOT VALID patch i found $subject... is this intended?
Aside from the ugliness of the code, we
Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of mié jun 15 11:54:25 -0400 2011:
Dean Rasheed dean.a.rash...@gmail.com writes:
On 15 June 2011 07:56, Jaime Casanova ja...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
Testing the CHECK NOT VALID patch i found $subject... is this intended?
Aside from the ugliness of the code,
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
So is somebody from 2nd Quadrant going to supply a patch to fix this?
well, i was going to give it a try... but in a couple of hours...
--
Jaime Casanova www.2ndQuadrant.com
Professional PostgreSQL:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:14 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
So is somebody from 2nd Quadrant going to supply a patch to fix this?
My understanding was that your patch had a bug, rather than the
existing code. If I misunderstood, please explain the bug.
In terms of
Excerpts from Simon Riggs's message of mié jun 15 16:31:45 -0400 2011:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:14 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
So is somebody from 2nd Quadrant going to supply a patch to fix this?
My understanding was that your patch had a bug, rather than the
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes:
So is somebody from 2nd Quadrant going to supply a patch to fix this?
I'm already on it. The whole patch appears to need some review,
considering this is about the fourth major flaw we've found in it.
regards, tom lane
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:59 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
Excerpts from Simon Riggs's message of mié jun 15 16:31:45 -0400 2011:
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 9:14 PM, Alvaro Herrera
alvhe...@commandprompt.com wrote:
So is somebody from 2nd Quadrant going to supply a patch
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:42 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Alvaro Herrera alvhe...@commandprompt.com writes:
So is somebody from 2nd Quadrant going to supply a patch to fix this?
I'm already on it. The whole patch appears to need some review,
considering this is about the fourth
11 matches
Mail list logo