Re: [HACKERS] ICU support on Windows

On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 6:45 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 6/12/17 14:03, Ashutosh Sharma wrote: >>> I noticed that this only works if you use the "Win32" download of ICU, >>> because the "Win64" download uses "lib64" paths. I'm not sure what the >>> impact

Re: [HACKERS] ICU support on Windows

On 13 June 2017 at 05:47, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Michael Paquier wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 3:13 AM, Alvaro Herrera >> wrote: >> > Ashutosh Sharma wrote: > >> >> Yes, that's right, Win64 download uses lib64 path and in my case i had >>

Re: [HACKERS] ICU support on Windows

On 6/12/17 14:03, Ashutosh Sharma wrote: >> I noticed that this only works if you use the "Win32" download of ICU, >> because the "Win64" download uses "lib64" paths. I'm not sure what the >> impact of this is in practice. > > Yes, that's right, Win64 download uses lib64 path and in my case i

Re: [HACKERS] ICU support on Windows

On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 6:47 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Michael Paquier wrote: >> I do some low level packaging on Windows (libxml2, libxslt, etc.), and >> the compilation code usually allows you to usually use the >> installation paths you want. At the end using only

Re: [HACKERS] ICU support on Windows

Michael Paquier wrote: > On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 3:13 AM, Alvaro Herrera > wrote: > > Ashutosh Sharma wrote: > >> Yes, that's right, Win64 download uses lib64 path and in my case i had > >> renamed lib64-> lib and bin64-> bin which i guess is not a right thing > >> to

Re: [HACKERS] ICU support on Windows

On Tue, Jun 13, 2017 at 3:13 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote: > Ashutosh Sharma wrote: >> > I noticed that this only works if you use the "Win32" download of ICU, >> > because the "Win64" download uses "lib64" paths. I'm not sure what the >> > impact of this is in practice. >>

Re: [HACKERS] ICU support on Windows

Hi, On Jun 12, 2017 11:43 PM, "Alvaro Herrera" wrote: Ashutosh Sharma wrote: > > I noticed that this only works if you use the "Win32" download of ICU, > > because the "Win64" download uses "lib64" paths. I'm not sure what the > > impact of this is in practice. > >

Re: [HACKERS] ICU support on Windows

Ashutosh Sharma wrote: > > I noticed that this only works if you use the "Win32" download of ICU, > > because the "Win64" download uses "lib64" paths. I'm not sure what the > > impact of this is in practice. > > Yes, that's right, Win64 download uses lib64 path and in my case i had > renamed

Re: [HACKERS] ICU support on Windows

Hi, On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 8:39 PM, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > On 6/10/17 05:40, Ashutosh Sharma wrote: >> With the help of attached patch, we can use icu feature on Windows. >> All we have to do is, download the ICU libraries from - [1] and add >> the

Re: [HACKERS] ICU support on Windows

On 6/10/17 05:40, Ashutosh Sharma wrote: > With the help of attached patch, we can use icu feature on Windows. > All we have to do is, download the ICU libraries from - [1] and add > the installation path for icu libraires in config.pl like, > > icu => 'E:\Users\pg\icu', > > [1]-

Re: [HACKERS] ICU support on Windows

Hi, On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 12:18 PM, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 6:40 PM, Ashutosh Sharma > wrote: >> Currently, we cannot perform ICU enabled build for postgres on Windows >> platform. However, this can be done on Linux

Re: [HACKERS] ICU support on Windows

On Sat, Jun 10, 2017 at 6:40 PM, Ashutosh Sharma wrote: > Currently, we cannot perform ICU enabled build for postgres on Windows > platform. However, this can be done on Linux platforms using > '--with-icu' configuration parameter. Attached is the patch that > allows us to

[HACKERS] ICU support on Windows

Hi All, Currently, we cannot perform ICU enabled build for postgres on Windows platform. However, this can be done on Linux platforms using '--with-icu' configuration parameter. Attached is the patch that allows us to perform icu enabled build for postgres on Windows platform provided that we