On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 7:47 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
I think a reasonable way to proceed might be to get some consensus on
a short list of patches we're willing to try to push to completion,
then set a schedule accordingly, and then anything that doesn't get
done by the deadline
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
* FOR KEY SHARE locks looks in very good shape and so I'm spending
time on that with a view to committing it next week if all goes well
Álvaro is a committer and is perfectly capable of committing that
patch for himself,
Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
* pg_stat_statements looks good also, I hope someone is looking at that
I will take that one, if it ever gets marked RFC, but in the meantime
I plan to spend my time elsewhere.
At this stage the CF app isn't helping us much. We need some way to
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com wrote:
* FOR KEY SHARE locks looks in very good shape and so I'm spending
time on that with a view to committing it next week if all goes well
Álvaro is
On Sat, Mar 10, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
* pg_stat_statements looks good also, I hope someone is looking at that
I will take that one, if it ever gets marked RFC, but in the meantime
I plan to spend my time elsewhere.
At
On 10 March 2012 15:47, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Simon Riggs si...@2ndquadrant.com writes:
* pg_stat_statements looks good also, I hope someone is looking at that
I will take that one, if it ever gets marked RFC, but in the meantime
I plan to spend my time elsewhere.
It has been
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
Well, if you get to the point where you're done churning the code in
the next week or so, I'm willing to do one or two more rounds of
serious review, but if that doesn't get us there then I think we need
to give up. The energy you've put into this is
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
This is a fair position, but I think it's a bit unfair to be applying
such pressure to just the command-triggers patch and not all the other
open issues. Hence, $SUBJECT: is it time to start forcing this
commitfest to a
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
There's been very little patch review going on, with a couple
of notable exceptions like Thom and Noah, and not a lot of new patch
versions from patch authors either, again with a few exceptions, like
Dimitri. So it's not terribly surprising that
Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com writes:
Just to be clear, it wasn't my intention to hold command triggers
specifically to a different standard - but I do differentiate between
small patches and big patches. Small patches that someone can get
committed with an hour's worth of review can be
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Dimitri Fontaine dimi...@2ndquadrant.fr wrote:
I share your view here, and in fact the code for the patch has been
updated in only two ways since 1/15: adding support for new commands and
reacting to review (refactoring, cleaning, features removal, fix the
On Friday, March 09, 2012 10:13:15 PM Robert Haas wrote:
If people are
tired of working on the CommitFest, they're not going to get
reinvigorated just because we let it go on for another month.
On that line: From Sundway onwards I do have time again to do reviewing. I am
not anybody is doing
12 matches
Mail list logo
