[HACKERS] Minor pre-bug in gram.y for DROP INDEX CONCURRENTLY IF_P EXISTS
http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=blob;f=src/backend/parser/gram.y;hb=master#l4940 The missing_ok property should be true. Just something I noticed when browsing the code. It appears to be a new language feature, so it probably hasn't been noticed by the general public yet. -- Brendan Byrd p...@resonatorsoft.org Brendan Byrd bb...@cpan.org -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
Re: [HACKERS] Minor pre-bug in gram.y for DROP INDEX CONCURRENTLY IF_P EXISTS
Brendan Byrd p...@resonatorsoft.org writes: http://git.postgresql.org/gitweb/?p=postgresql.git;a=blob;f=src/backend/parser/gram.y;hb=master#l4940 The missing_ok property should be true. [ rolls eyes ] Apparently that patch wasn't ever, you know, tested? Will fix, thanks for spotting it! regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers