Any status on this?
---
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 04:34:51PM +0100, Vik Reykja wrote:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 15:25, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 9:06 PM, Vik Reykja
On 27 August 2012 19:09, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Any status on this?
Tom took care of it in the last commitfest -
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2012-06/msg01075.php
I think that todo item can now be marked as done.
Regards,
Dean
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 08:35:00PM +0100, Dean Rasheed wrote:
On 27 August 2012 19:09, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Any status on this?
Tom took care of it in the last commitfest -
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2012-06/msg01075.php
I think that todo item can
On 27 August 2012 20:42, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 08:35:00PM +0100, Dean Rasheed wrote:
On 27 August 2012 19:09, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Any status on this?
Tom took care of it in the last commitfest -
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 09:10:35PM +0100, Dean Rasheed wrote:
On 27 August 2012 20:42, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 08:35:00PM +0100, Dean Rasheed wrote:
On 27 August 2012 19:09, Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us wrote:
Any status on this?
Tom took
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 09:10:35PM +0100, Dean Rasheed wrote:
It's listed under https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo#Referential_Integrity
I think the main points mentioned there have now all been taken care of.
Ah, got it. Marked as done.
IMO the
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 04:37:25PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 09:10:35PM +0100, Dean Rasheed wrote:
It's listed under
https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo#Referential_Integrity
I think the main points mentioned there have now
Bruce Momjian br...@momjian.us writes:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 04:37:25PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
IMO the second point is done but the first is not: there's still a
question of whether we could remove the trigger-time checks for equality
now that there's an upstream filter. Possibly break the
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 7:36 AM, Vik Reykja vikrey...@gmail.com wrote:
I decided to take a crack at the todo item created from the following post:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2005-10/msg00458.php
The attached patch makes the desired changes in both code and function
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 9:06 PM, Vik Reykja vikrey...@gmail.com wrote:
I decided to take a crack at the todo item created from the following post:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2005-10/msg00458.php
The attached patch makes the desired changes in both code and function
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 15:25, Robert Haas robertmh...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 9:06 PM, Vik Reykja vikrey...@gmail.com wrote:
I decided to take a crack at the todo item created from the following
post:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2005-10/msg00458.php
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:02, Chetan Suttraway
chetan.suttra...@enterprisedb.com wrote:
The patch was not getting applied. Was seeing below message:
postgresql$ git apply /Downloads/unchanged.patch
error: src/backend/utils/adt/ri_triggers.c: already exists in working
directory
Have come
I decided to take a crack at the todo item created from the following post:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-performance/2005-10/msg00458.php
The attached patch makes the desired changes in both code and function
naming.
It seemed quite easy to do but wasn't marked as easy on the todo, so
13 matches
Mail list logo
