Hi,
On 01/31/2016 01:25 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
This hasn't been updated in a long time; I should have closed it
earlier. Chatting with Tomas about it, he seemed inclined to just have
the patch rejected because it's not terribly useful anyway.
we've discussed that some time ago and my memor
This hasn't been updated in a long time; I should have closed it
earlier. Chatting with Tomas about it, he seemed inclined to just have
the patch rejected because it's not terribly useful anyway.
I'm marking it as rejected. Unless someone has a compelling use case
for this feature that hasn't be
On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 4:24 AM, Tomas Vondra
wrote:
>
>
> On 12/12/2015 11:39 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
>
>> On 2015-12-12 23:28:33 +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>>
>>> On 12/12/2015 11:20 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
>>>
On 2015-12-12 22:14:13 +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> this is the seco
On 12/12/2015 11:39 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2015-12-12 23:28:33 +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
On 12/12/2015 11:20 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
On 2015-12-12 22:14:13 +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
this is the second improvement proposed in the thread [1] about ext4 data
loss issue. It adds another
On 2015-12-12 23:28:33 +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> On 12/12/2015 11:20 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> >On 2015-12-12 22:14:13 +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> >>this is the second improvement proposed in the thread [1] about ext4 data
> >>loss issue. It adds another field to control file, tracking the las
On 12/12/2015 11:20 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
Hi,
On 2015-12-12 22:14:13 +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
this is the second improvement proposed in the thread [1] about ext4 data
loss issue. It adds another field to control file, tracking the last known
WAL segment. This does not eliminate the data
Hi,
On 2015-12-12 22:14:13 +0100, Tomas Vondra wrote:
> this is the second improvement proposed in the thread [1] about ext4 data
> loss issue. It adds another field to control file, tracking the last known
> WAL segment. This does not eliminate the data loss, just the silent part of
> it when the
Hi,
this is the second improvement proposed in the thread [1] about ext4
data loss issue. It adds another field to control file, tracking the
last known WAL segment. This does not eliminate the data loss, just the
silent part of it when the last segment gets lost (due to forgetting the
rename