Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 9.5.0 regress tests fails with Python 3.5.0

2016-01-20 Thread Tom Lane
Pavel Stehule writes: > make check-world fails, > It is fixed in HEAD. BTW, I have now spun up a new buildfarm member "longfin", which is testing against Python 3.5.1 (except in the 9.1 branch, where that doesn't work). regards, tom lane --

[HACKERS] PostgreSQL 9.5.0 regress tests fails with Python 3.5.0

2016-01-08 Thread Pavel Stehule
Hi make check-world fails, It is fixed in HEAD. Regards Pavel

Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 9.5.0 regress tests fails with Python 3.5.0

2016-01-08 Thread Pavel Stehule
2016-01-08 18:45 GMT+01:00 Pavel Stehule : > > > 2016-01-08 18:33 GMT+01:00 Pavel Stehule : > >> >> >> 2016-01-08 17:42 GMT+01:00 Tom Lane : >> >>> Pavel Stehule writes: >>> > make check-world fails,

Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 9.5.0 regress tests fails with Python 3.5.0

2016-01-08 Thread Pavel Stehule
2016-01-08 18:33 GMT+01:00 Pavel Stehule : > > > 2016-01-08 17:42 GMT+01:00 Tom Lane : > >> Pavel Stehule writes: >> > make check-world fails, >> > It is fixed in HEAD. >> >> Hmm. Apparently when Peter back-patched f16d52269,

Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 9.5.0 regress tests fails with Python 3.5.0

2016-01-08 Thread Pavel Stehule
2016-01-08 17:42 GMT+01:00 Tom Lane : > Pavel Stehule writes: > > make check-world fails, > > It is fixed in HEAD. > > Hmm. Apparently when Peter back-patched f16d52269, he missed the 9.5 > branch :-(. I don't have Python 3.5 here, but blindly

Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 9.5.0 regress tests fails with Python 3.5.0

2016-01-08 Thread Tom Lane
Pavel Stehule writes: > make check-world fails, > It is fixed in HEAD. Hmm. Apparently when Peter back-patched f16d52269, he missed the 9.5 branch :-(. I don't have Python 3.5 here, but blindly pushed the same patch into 9.5. regards, tom lane