Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] BUG #14657: Server process segmentation fault in v10, May 10th dev snapshot

2017-05-19 Thread Robert Haas
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 6:07 AM, Ashutosh Bapat wrote: > We still have the same copy shared across multiple append paths and > set_plan_refs would change change it underneath those. May not be a > problem right now but may be a problem in the future. I agree. I

Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] BUG #14657: Server process segmentation fault in v10, May 10th dev snapshot

2017-05-19 Thread Ashutosh Bapat
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 7:23 AM, Amit Langote wrote: > On 2017/05/18 10:49, Amit Langote wrote: >> On 2017/05/18 2:14, Dilip Kumar wrote: >>> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 7:41 PM, wrote: (gdb) bt #0 0x0061ab1b in list_nth

[HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] BUG #14657: Server process segmentation fault in v10, May 10th dev snapshot

2017-05-18 Thread Sveinn Sveinsson
The patch fixed the problem, thanks a lot. Regards, Sveinn. On fim 18.maí 2017 01:53, Amit Langote wrote: > On 2017/05/18 10:49, Amit Langote wrote: >> On 2017/05/18 2:14, Dilip Kumar wrote: >>> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 7:41 PM, wrote: (gdb) bt #0

[HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] BUG #14657: Server process segmentation fault in v10, May 10th dev snapshot

2017-05-17 Thread Amit Langote
On 2017/05/18 10:49, Amit Langote wrote: > On 2017/05/18 2:14, Dilip Kumar wrote: >> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 7:41 PM, wrote: >>> (gdb) bt >>> #0 0x0061ab1b in list_nth () >>> #1 0x005e4081 in ExecLockNonLeafAppendTables () >>> #2 0x005f4d52