On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 11:43:04AM -0700, David Fetter wrote:
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 10:15:12PM -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
See attached patch revisions. The first patch edits
find_minmax_aggs_walker()
per my comments just now. The second is an update of your FILTER patch with
the
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 10:15:12PM -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
On Sun, Jul 07, 2013 at 06:37:26PM -0700, David Fetter wrote:
On Sat, Jul 06, 2013 at 11:49:21AM +0100, Dean Rasheed wrote:
Overall I think this patch offers useful additional functionality, in
compliance with the SQL spec, which
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 06:56:17PM +, Andrew Gierth wrote:
Noah Misch said:
I twitched upon reading this, because neither ORDER BY nor FILTER preclude
the aggregate being MIN or MAX. Perhaps Andrew can explain why he put
aggorder there back in 2009.
The bottom line is that I
On Sun, Jul 07, 2013 at 06:37:26PM -0700, David Fetter wrote:
On Sat, Jul 06, 2013 at 11:49:21AM +0100, Dean Rasheed wrote:
Overall I think this patch offers useful additional functionality, in
compliance with the SQL spec, which should be handy to simplify
complex grouping queries.
As I
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 10:15:12PM -0400, Noah Misch wrote:
On Sun, Jul 07, 2013 at 06:37:26PM -0700, David Fetter wrote:
On Sat, Jul 06, 2013 at 11:49:21AM +0100, Dean Rasheed wrote:
Overall I think this patch offers useful additional functionality, in
compliance with the SQL spec, which
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 08:41:59AM +, Andrew Gierth wrote:
Tom Lane said:
Agreed, separating out the function-call-with-trailing-declaration
syntaxes so they aren't considered in FROM and index_elem seems
like the best compromise.
If we do that for window function OVER clauses as
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 3:50 AM, Tom Lane t...@sss.pgh.pa.us wrote:
Or maybe they really don't give a damn about breaking
applications every time they invent a new reserved word?
I think this is the obvious conclusion. In the standard the reserved
words are pretty explicitly reserved and not
Greg Stark st...@mit.edu writes:
I think their model is that applications work with a certain version
of SQL and they're not expected to work with a new version without
extensive updating.
Hm. We could invent a sql_version parameter and tweak the lexer to
return keywords added in spec
